首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Phonological-Lexical Feedback during Early Abstract Encoding: The Case of Deaf Readers
【2h】

Phonological-Lexical Feedback during Early Abstract Encoding: The Case of Deaf Readers

机译:早期摘要编码中的语音词汇反馈:聋哑读者案例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the masked priming technique, physical identity between prime and target enjoys an advantage over nominal identity in nonwords (GEDA-GEDA faster than geda-GEDA). However, nominal identity overrides physical identity in words (e.g., REAL-REAL similar to real-REAL). Here we tested whether the lack of an advantage of the physical identity condition for words was due to top-down feedback from phonological-lexical information. We examined this issue with deaf readers, as their phonological representations are not as fully developed as in hearing readers. Results revealed that physical identity enjoyed a processing advantage over nominal identity not only in nonwords but also in words (GEDA-GEDA faster than geda-GEDA; REAL-REAL faster than real-REAL). This suggests the existence of fundamental differences in the early stages of visual word recognition of hearing and deaf readers, possibly related to the amount of feedback from higher levels of information.
机译:在屏蔽启动技术中,启动和目标之间的物理身份优于非单词的名义身份(GEDA-GEDA比geda-GEDA更快)。但是,名义身份会覆盖文字中的物理身份(例如,类似于real-REAL的REAL-REAL)。在这里,我们测试了单词的物理身份条件是否缺乏优势,是否归因于语音-词汇信息的自上而下的反馈。我们与聋哑读者一起研究了这个问题,因为他们的语音表达没有听觉读者那样充分发展。结果表明,物理身份不仅在非单词方面而且在单词方面都比名义身份具有处理上的优势(GEDA-GEDA比geda-GEDA更快; REAL-REAL快于real-REAL)。这表明在听力和聋哑读者的视觉单词识别的早期阶段存在根本差异,这可能与较高级别信息的反馈量有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号