首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Views of Medical Doctors Regarding the 2013 WHO Adult HIV Treatment Guidelines Indicate Variable Applicability for Routine Patient Monitoring, for Their Family Members and for Themselves, in South-Africa
【2h】

Views of Medical Doctors Regarding the 2013 WHO Adult HIV Treatment Guidelines Indicate Variable Applicability for Routine Patient Monitoring, for Their Family Members and for Themselves, in South-Africa

机译:关于2013年世界卫生组织《成人HIV治疗指南》的医生的观点表明,南非在常规监测患者,其家庭成员和他们自己身上的适用性各异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

South African doctors (n = 211) experienced in antiretroviral therapy use were asked via an online questionnaire about the WHO 2013 adult antiretroviral integrated guidelines, as well as clinical and personal issues, in three hypothetical scenarios: directing the Minister of Health, advising a family member requiring therapy amidst unstable antiretroviral supplies, and where doctors themselves were HIV-positive. Doctors (54%) favoured the 500 cells/μl WHO initiation threshold if advising the Minister; a third recommended retaining the 350 cells/μl threshold used at the time of the survey. However, they favoured a higher initiation threshold for their family member. Doctors were 4.9 fold more likely to initiate modern treatment, irrespective of their CD4 cell count, for themselves than for public-sector patients (95%CI odds ratio = 3.33–7.33; P<0.001, although lower if limited to stavudine-containing regimens. Doctors were equally concerned about stavudine-induced lactic acidosis and lipoatrophy. The majority (84%) would use WHO-recommended first-line therapy, with concerns split between tenofovir-induced nephrotoxicity (55%), and efavirenz central nervous system effects (29%). A majority (61%), if HIV-positive, would pay for a pre-initiation resistance test, use influenza-prophylaxis (85%), but not INH-prophylaxis (61%), and treat their cholesterol and blood pressure concerns conventionally (63% and 60%). Over 60% wanted viral loads and creatinine measured six monthly. A third felt CD4 monitoring only necessary if clinically indicated or if virological failure occurred. They would use barrier prevention (83%), but not recommend pre-exposure prophylaxis, if their sexual partner was HIV-negative (68%). A minority would be completely open about their HIV status, but the majority would disclose to their sexual partners, close family and friends. Respondents were overwhelmingly in favour of continued antiretrovirals after breastfeeding. In conclusion, doctors largely supported adult WHO guidelines as public policy, although would initiate treatment at higher CD4 counts for their family and themselves. Resistance to INH-prophylaxis is unexpected and warrants investigation.
机译:通过在线调查表,询问了在抗逆转录病毒疗法使用方面有经验的南非医生(n = 211),涉及以下三种假设情况:世卫组织2013年成人抗逆转录病毒综合指南以及临床和个人问题:指导卫生部长,为家庭提供咨询该成员需要在不稳定的抗逆转录病毒药物以及医生本身为HIV阳性的地方进行治疗。如果建议部长,医生(54%)赞成500细胞/μlWHO起始阈值;三分之一建议保留调查时使用的350细胞/微升阈值。但是,他们赞成其家庭成员的起步门槛较高。与公共部门患者相比,与CD4细胞计数无关,医生进行现代治疗的可能性是公共部门患者的4.9倍(95%CI比值比= 3.33–7.33; P <0.001,但是如果仅限于含司他夫定的治疗方案则更低医生同样关注司他夫定引起的乳酸性酸中毒和脂肪萎缩。大多数(84%)患者将使用世卫组织推荐的一线疗法,其关注点分为替诺福韦引起的肾毒性(55%)和依非韦伦中枢神经系统影响( 29%)。如果大多数人(61%)如果HIV呈阳性,则将支付抗药前测试的费用,使用预防流感的方法(85%),但不使用预防INH的方法(61%),并治疗其胆固醇和血压问题通常(63%和60%)。超过60%的人希望每月进行六次病毒载量和肌酐测量;只有在临床上有指征或发生病毒学衰竭时,才有三分之一的CD4监测需要,他们将使用屏障预防(83%),但不建议曝光前准备ylaxis,如果他们的性伴侣是HIV阴性(68%)。少数人将完全了解其艾滋病毒状况,但大多数人会向性伴侣,亲密的家人和朋友透露。母乳喂养后,绝大多数人赞成继续使用抗逆转录病毒药物。总之,尽管世卫组织为成人及其家人以较高的CD4计数开始治疗,但医生在很大程度上支持将WHO成人指南作为公共政策。对INH预防的耐药性是出乎意料的,需要进行调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号