首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Referrals between Public Sector Health Institutions for Women with Obstetric High Risk, Complications, or Emergencies in India – A Systematic Review
【2h】

Referrals between Public Sector Health Institutions for Women with Obstetric High Risk, Complications, or Emergencies in India – A Systematic Review

机译:印度产科高危,并发症或紧急情况女性的公共部门卫生机构之间的转诊-系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Emergency obstetric care (EmOC) within primary health care systems requires a linked referral system to be effective in reducing maternal death. This systematic review aimed to summarize evidence on the proportion of referrals between institutions during pregnancy and delivery, and the factors affecting referrals, in India. We searched 6 electronic databases, reviewed four regional databases and repositories, and relevant program reports from India published between 1994 and 2013. All types of study or reports (except editorials, comments and letters) which reported on institution-referrals (out-referral or in-referral) for obstetric care were included. Results were synthesized on the proportion and the reasons for referral, and factors affecting referrals. Of the 11,346 articles identified by the search, we included 232 articles in the full text review and extracted data from 16 studies that met our inclusion criteria Of the 16, one was RCT, seven intervention cohort (without controls), six cross-sectional, and three qualitative studies. Bias and quality of studies were reported. Between 25% and 52% of all pregnancies were referred from Sub-centres for antenatal high-risk, 14% to 36% from nurse run delivery or basic EmOC centres for complications or emergencies, and 2 to 7% were referred from doctor run basic EmOC centres for specialist care at comprehensive EmOC centres. Problems identified with referrals from peripheral health centres included low skills and confidence of staff, reluctance to induce labour, confusion over the clinical criteria for referral, non-uniform standards of care at referral institutions, a tendency to by-pass middle level institutions, a lack of referral communication and supervision, and poor compliance. The high proportion of referrals from peripheral health centers reflects the lack of appropriate clinical guidelines, processes, and skills for obstetric care and referral in India. This, combined with inadequate referral communication and low compliance, is likely to contribute to gaps and delays in the provision of emergency obstetric care.
机译:初级卫生保健系统中的紧急产科护理(EmOC)需要链接的转诊系统才能有效减少产妇死亡。这项系统的审查旨在总结印度怀孕和分娩期间机构间转诊的比例以及影响转诊的因素的证据。我们搜索了6个电子数据库,审查了四个区域数据库和存储库,并在1994年至2013年之间发布了印度的相关计划报告。所有类型的研究或报告(社论,评论和信函除外)均报告了机构推荐(推荐或推荐)。在转诊)产科护理。根据转诊的比例和原因以及影响转诊的因素综合了结果。通过搜索确定的11346篇文章中,我们在全文审阅中纳入232篇文章,并从16项符合纳入标准的研究中提取了数据。其中16篇是RCT,7篇干预队列(无对照),6篇横断面,和三项定性研究。报告了偏倚和研究质量。从分中心转诊的所有孕妇中,有25%至52%为产前高风险,从护士分娩或基本的EmOC中心因并发症或紧急情况转介的孕妇为14%至36%,而从基础医生转诊的基本为2%至7% EmOC的综合护理中心设有专科护理中心。从外围医疗中心转诊时发现的问题包括技能低下和员工信心不足,不愿引产,对转诊的临床标准感到困惑,转诊机构的护理标准不统一,倾向于绕过中级机构,缺乏推荐人沟通和监督,合规性差。来自外围医疗中心的转诊比例很高,这反映了印度缺乏适当的临床指南,流程和产科护理和转诊技能。再加上转诊沟通不充分和依从性差,很可能会导致产科急诊服务的差距和延误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号