首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >No Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning Strategies on Recovery from Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Protective Molecular Mediators
【2h】

No Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning Strategies on Recovery from Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Protective Molecular Mediators

机译:远程缺血性调节策略对肾脏缺血再灌注损伤的恢复和保护性分子药物均无影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is the major cause of acute kidney injury. Remote ischemic conditioning (rIC) performed as brief intermittent sub-lethal ischemia and reperfusion episodes in a distant organ may protect the kidney against IRI. Here we investigated the renal effects of rIC applied either prior to (remote ischemic preconditioning; rIPC) or during (remote ischemic perconditioning; rIPerC) sustained ischemic kidney injury in rats. The effects were evaluated as differences in creatinine clearance (CrCl) rate, tissue tubular damage marker expression, and potential kidney recovery mediators. One week after undergoing right-sided nephrectomy, rats were randomly divided into four groups: sham (n = 7), ischemia and reperfusion (IR; n = 10), IR+rIPC (n = 10), and IR+rIPerC (n = 10). The rIC was performed as four repeated episodes of 5-minute clamping of the infrarenal aorta followed by 5-minute release either before or during 37 minutes of left renal artery clamping representing the IRI. Urine and blood were sampled prior to ischemia as well as 3 and 7 days after reperfusion. The kidney was harvested for mRNA and protein isolation. Seven days after IRI, the CrCl change from baseline values was similar in the IR (δ: 0.74 mL/min/kg [-0.45 to 1.94]), IR+rIPC (δ: 0.21 mL/min/kg [-0.75 to 1.17], p > 0.9999), and IR+rIPerC (δ: 0.41 mL/min/kg [-0.43 to 1.25], p > 0.9999) groups. Kidney function recovery was associated with a significant up-regulation of phosphorylated protein kinase B (pAkt), extracellular regulated kinase 1/2 (pERK1/2), and heat shock proteins (HSPs) pHSP27, HSP32, and HSP70, but rIC was not associated with any significant differences in tubular damage, inflammatory, or fibrosis marker expression. In our study, rIC did not protect the kidney against IRI. However, on days 3–7 after IRI, all groups recovered renal function. This was associated with pAkt and pERK1/2 up-regulation and increased HSP expression at day 7.
机译:缺血再灌注损伤(IRI)是急性肾损伤的主要原因。由于短暂的间歇性亚致死性缺血和远处器官的再灌注发作而进行的远程缺血调节(rIC)可以保护肾脏免受IRI侵害。在这里,我们研究了在大鼠(缺血性预适应; rIPC)之前或期间(远程缺血性预处理; rIPerC)持续缺血性肾损伤中应用rIC的肾脏作用。以肌酐清除率(CrCl)率,组织肾小管损伤标志物表达和潜在的肾脏恢复介导因子之间的差异进行评估。右侧肾切除术后一周,大鼠随机分为四组:假手术(n = 7),缺血和再灌注(IR; n = 10),IR + rIPC(n = 10)和IR + rIPerC(n = 10)。进行rIC的过程是重复四次,每次将肾下主动脉夹住5分钟,然后在代表IRI的左肾动脉夹住37分钟之前或期间释放5分钟。在缺血之前以及再灌注后3和7天取样尿液和血液。收获肾脏用于mRNA和蛋白质分离。 IRI后7天,IR中的CrCl从基线值变化相似(δ:0.74 mL / min / kg [-0.45至1.94]),IR + rIPC(δ:0.21 mL / min / kg [-0.75至1.17] ],p> 0.9999)和IR + rIPerC(δ:0.41 mL / min / kg [-0.43至1.25],p> 0.9999)组。肾脏功能的恢复与磷酸化蛋白激酶B(pAkt),细胞外调节激酶1/2(pERK1 / 2)和热休克蛋白(HSP)pHSP27,HSP32和HSP70的显着上调相关,但rIC却没有与肾小管损伤,炎症或纤维化标记物表达的任何显着差异有关。在我们的研究中,rIC没有保护肾脏免受IRI侵害。但是,在IRI后3-7天,所有组均恢复了肾功能。这与第7天的pAkt和pERK1 / 2上调以及HSP表达增加有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号