首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Reducing Insecticide Use in Broad-Acre Grains Production: An Australian Study
【2h】

Reducing Insecticide Use in Broad-Acre Grains Production: An Australian Study

机译:一项澳大利亚研究表明,在大面积谷物生产中减少杀虫剂的使用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Prophylactic use of broad-spectrum insecticides is a common feature of broad-acre grains production systems around the world. Efforts to reduce pesticide use in these systems have the potential to deliver environmental benefits to large areas of agricultural land. However, research and extension initiatives aimed at decoupling pest management decisions from the simple act of applying a cheap insecticide have languished. This places farmers in a vulnerable position of high reliance on a few products that may lose their efficacy due to pests developing resistance, or be lost from use due to regulatory changes. The first step towards developing Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies involves an increased efficiency of pesticide inputs. Especially challenging is an understanding of when and where an insecticide application can be withheld without risking yield loss. Here, we quantify the effect of different pest management strategies on the abundance of pest and beneficial arthropods, crop damage and yield, across five sites that span the diversity of contexts in which grains crops are grown in southern Australia. Our results show that while greater insecticide use did reduce the abundance of many pests, this was not coupled with higher yields. Feeding damage by arthropod pests was seen in plots with lower insecticide use but this did not translate into yield losses. For canola, we found that plots that used insecticide seed treatments were most likely to deliver a yield benefit; however other insecticides appear to be unnecessary and economically costly. When considering wheat, none of the insecticide inputs provided an economically justifiable yield gain. These results indicate that there are opportunities for Australian grain growers to reduce insecticide inputs without risking yield loss in some seasons. We see this as the critical first step towards developing IPM practices that will be widely adopted across intensive production systems.
机译:预防性使用广谱杀虫剂是世界范围内广亩粮食生产系统的共同特征。在这些系统中减少农药使用的努力有可能为大面积的农业用地带来环境效益。但是,旨在将有害生物管理决定与应用廉价杀虫剂这一简单行为脱钩的研究和推广计划却陷入了困境。这使农民处于对某些产品的高度依赖的脆弱境地,这些产品可能由于害虫的抗药性而失去功效,或者由于法规变化而因使用而损失。制定病虫害综合防治(IPM)战略的第一步涉及提高农药投入的效率。尤其具有挑战性的是要了解何时可以在何处停止使用杀虫剂,而又不会导致产量损失。在这里,我们量化了跨越澳大利亚南部谷物作物生长环境的五个地点的不同有害生物管理策略对有害生物和有益节肢动物的丰度,作物危害和产量的影响。我们的结果表明,虽然更多地使用杀虫剂确实减少了许多害虫的数量,但这并没有带来更高的产量。在使用较少杀虫剂的地块中发现了节肢动物害虫对饲料的破坏,但这并未转化为产量损失。对于双低油菜籽,我们发现使用杀虫剂种子处理的地块最有可能带来增产效益。然而,其他杀虫剂似乎是不必要的,并且在经济上昂贵。当考虑使用小麦时,没有任何杀虫剂投入可提供经济上合理的单产。这些结果表明,澳大利亚的谷物种植者有机会减少杀虫剂的投入,而不必担心某些季节的产量损失。我们认为这是发展IPM做法的关键的第一步,该做法将在集约化生产系统中广泛采用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号