首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Effect of Seated Trunk Posture on Eye Blink Startle and Subjective Experience: Comparing Flexion, Neutral Upright Posture, and Extension of Spine
【2h】

Effect of Seated Trunk Posture on Eye Blink Startle and Subjective Experience: Comparing Flexion, Neutral Upright Posture, and Extension of Spine

机译:躯干姿势坐姿对眨眼惊吓和主观体验的影响:比较屈曲,中立姿势和脊柱伸展

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Postures are known to be able to affect emotion and motivation. Much less is known about whether (affective) modulation of eye blink startle occurs following specific postures. The objective of the current study was to explore this. Participants in the present study were requested to assume three different sitting postures: with the spine flexed (slouched), neutral upright, and extended. Each posture was assumed for four minutes, and was followed by the administration of brief self-report questionnaires before proceeding to the next posture. The same series of postures and measures were repeated prior to ending the experiment. Results indicate that, relative to the other postures, the extended sitting posture was associated with an increased startle, was more unpleasant, arousing, had smaller levels of dominance, induced more discomfort, and was perceived as more difficult. The upright and flexed sitting postures differed in the level of self-reported positive affect, but not in eye blink startle amplitudes.
机译:姿势可以影响情绪和动机。关于眨眼惊吓是否会在特定姿势后发生(情感)调节,人们所知甚少。当前研究的目的是探索这一点。本研究的参与者被要求采取三种不同的坐姿:脊椎弯曲(s缩),中立直立和伸展。每个姿势假定进行四分钟,然后进行简短的自我报告调查表,然后再进行下一个姿势。在结束实验之前,重复相同的一系列姿势和测量。结果表明,相对于其他姿势,延长的坐姿会增加惊吓感,使人更不舒服,更易唤醒,具有较小的主导地位,引起更多的不适感,并且被认为更加困难。直立和弯曲的坐姿在自我报告的正面影响水平上有所不同,但眨眼惊吓幅度没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号