首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >To Burn or Not to Burn? Effect of Management Strategy on North American Prairie Vegetation for Public Urban Areas in Germany
【2h】

To Burn or Not to Burn? Effect of Management Strategy on North American Prairie Vegetation for Public Urban Areas in Germany

机译:燃烧还是不燃烧?管理策略对德国公共城市地区北美大草原植被的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

North American prairie vegetation has been a role model for designing highly attractive plantings for German urban green spaces for the past decade. In combination with gravel mulch top layers on planting sites and non-selective maintenance techniques like mowing or burning, prairie plantings are considered to be cost-effective and low-maintenance. This study was undertaken to assess the impact of different maintenance strategies and especially the necessity of fire management on the development success of ornamental prairie plantings in central Europe. A four factorial split-plot-block design was set up for investigation of different mixtures of prairie species under varying management conditions (mow-only, mowing plus selective weeding, mowing plus weeding and burning) on two differing soil types (in-situ topsoil and in-situ topsoil with a graywacke gravel mulch top layer) over three years. Significant effects of maintenance strategy on mortality rates and vitality were documented for a number of target species, which responded species specifically, either being slightly affected by the burning or thriving on it. Those effects were mostly restricted to topsoil sites. A strong impact on weed species presence and abundance and resulting maintenance times was found on both soil types. On topsoil sites, mow-only treatment resulted in a short-term loss of the original planting due to extensive weed growth. Corresponding gravel mulch sites were generally less colonised and visually dominated by weeds. Differences between weeded and weeded plus burned sites were minor. Unexpectedly, weed species populations were mostly unaffected by the additional burning treatment, while maintenance times and costs increased. No overall benefit of fire management for the establishment of prairie plantings was documented. The most effective management combination proved to be mowing plus regular selective weeding measures on gravel mulched planting sites.
机译:过去十年来,北美大草原植被一直是为德国城市绿地设计极具吸引力的植物的榜样。结合种植现场的砾石覆盖顶层和非选择性维护技术(例如割草或焚烧),草原种植被认为具有成本效益且维护成本低。这项研究旨在评估不同维护策略的影响,尤其是火灾管理对中欧观赏草原种植成功发展的必要性。建立了一种四因子分裂样区设计,以研究两种不同土壤类型(原位表土)在不同管理条件下(仅割草,割草+选择性除草,割草+除草和燃烧)不同草原物种的混合物。以及三年内的原地表土和Graywacke碎石覆盖层)。记录了许多目标物种的维持策略对死亡率和生命力的显着影响,这些目标物种对物种的反应特别强烈,这些物种受其燃烧或繁衍的影响很小。这些影响主要限于表土。两种土壤类型都对杂草物种的存在和丰度以及由此产生的维持时间产生了强烈影响。在表土上,由于广泛的杂草生长,仅进行割草的处理导致了原始种植的短期损失。相应的砾石覆盖地通常定居较少,并且在视觉上由杂草控制。杂草和杂草加烧伤部位之间的差异很小。出乎意料的是,杂草物种种群大多不受额外燃烧处理的影响,而维护时间和成本却增加了。没有记录到火灾管理对建立草原种植的总体好处。事实证明,最有效的管理组合是在砾石覆盖的种植地上割草和定期进行选择性除草措施。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 PLoS Clinical Trials
  • 作者

    Anja Schmithals; Norbert Kühn;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 2010(9),10
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 e108588
  • 总页数 11
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 12:35:14

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号