首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Calcium Channel Blockers, More than Diuretics, Enhance Vascular Protective Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Salt-Loaded Hypertensive Rats
【2h】

Calcium Channel Blockers, More than Diuretics, Enhance Vascular Protective Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Salt-Loaded Hypertensive Rats

机译:钙通道阻滞剂比利尿剂更能增强盐负荷高血压大鼠的血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的血管保护作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The combination therapy of an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) with a calcium channel blocker (CCB) or with a diuretic is favorably recommended for the treatment of hypertension. However, the difference between these two combination therapies is unclear. The present work was undertaken to examine the possible difference between the two combination therapies in vascular protection. Salt-loaded stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP) were divided into 6 groups, and they were orally administered (1) vehicle, (2) olmesartan, an ARB, (3) azelnidipine, a CCB, (4) hydrochlorothiazide, a diuretic, (5) olmesartan combined with azelnidipine, or (6) olmesartan combined with hydrochlorothiazide. Olmesartan combined with either azelnidipine or hydrochlorothiazide ameliorated vascular endothelial dysfunction and remodeling in SHRSP more than did monotherapy with either agent. However, despite a comparable blood pressure lowering effect between the two treatments, azelnidipine enhanced the amelioration of vascular endothelial dysfunction and remodeling by olmesartan to a greater extent than did hydrochlorothiazide in salt-loaded SHRSP. The increased enhancement by azelnidipine of olmesartan-induced vascular protection than by hydrochlorothiazide was associated with a greater amelioration of vascular nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase activation, superoxide, mitogen-activated protein kinase activation, and with a greater activation of the Akt/endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) pathway. These results provided the first evidence that a CCB potentiates the vascular protective effects of an ARB in salt-sensitive hypertension, compared with a diuretic, and provided a novel rationale explaining the benefit of the combination therapy with an ARB and a CCB.
机译:推荐将血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)与钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)或利尿剂联合治疗以治疗高血压。但是,这两种组合疗法之间的区别尚不清楚。进行本工作以检查两种组合疗法在血管保护方面的可能差异。盐负荷性卒中易发性自发性高血压大鼠(SHRSP)分为6组,分别口服(1)载体,(2)奥美沙坦,ARB,(3)氮卓尼平,CCB,(4)氢氯噻嗪,利尿剂,(5)奥美沙坦联合阿兹地平,或(6)奥美沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪。奥美沙坦联合阿兹地平或氢氯噻嗪改善了SHRSP的血管内皮功能障碍和重塑,优于任何一种药物的单药治疗。然而,尽管两种疗法在降低血压方面具有可比的效果,但在盐负荷的SHRSP中,阿兹尼平对舒张血管内皮功能的改善和奥美沙坦的重塑作用大于氢氯噻嗪。氮芥对奥美沙坦诱导的血管保护作用的增强作用比氢氯噻嗪的增强作用与血管烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸磷酸(NADPH)氧化酶激活,超氧化物,促分裂原激活的蛋白激酶激活的改善程度更大以及Akt /内皮型一氧化氮合酶(eNOS)途径。这些结果提供了第一个证据,即与利尿剂相比,CCB增强了ARB在盐敏感性高血压中的血管保护作用,并提供了新颖的原理来说明ARB和CCB联合治疗的益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号