首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >The Use of Carcasses for the Analysis of Cetacean Population Genetic Structure: A Comparative Study in Two Dolphin Species
【2h】

The Use of Carcasses for the Analysis of Cetacean Population Genetic Structure: A Comparative Study in Two Dolphin Species

机译:尸体在分析鲸类种群遗传结构中的应用:两种海豚物种的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Advances in molecular techniques have enabled the study of genetic diversity and population structure in many different contexts. Studies that assess the genetic structure of cetacean populations often use biopsy samples from free-ranging individuals and tissue samples from stranded animals or individuals that became entangled in fishery or aquaculture equipment. This leads to the question of how representative the location of a stranded or entangled animal is with respect to its natural range, and whether similar results would be obtained when comparing carcass samples with samples from free-ranging individuals in studies of population structure. Here we use tissue samples from carcasses of dolphins that stranded or died as a result of bycatch in South Australia to investigate spatial population structure in two species: coastal bottlenose (Tursiops sp.) and short-beaked common dolphins (Delphinus delphis). We compare these results with those previously obtained from biopsy sampled free-ranging dolphins in the same area to test whether carcass samples yield similar patterns of genetic variability and population structure. Data from dolphin carcasses were gathered using seven microsatellite markers and a fragment of the mitochondrial DNA control region. Analyses based on carcass samples alone failed to detect genetic structure in Tursiops sp., a species previously shown to exhibit restricted dispersal and moderate genetic differentiation across a small spatial scale in this region. However, genetic structure was correctly inferred in D. delphis, a species previously shown to have reduced genetic structure over a similar geographic area. We propose that in the absence of corroborating data, and when population structure is assessed over relatively small spatial scales, the sole use of carcasses may lead to an underestimate of genetic differentiation. This can lead to a failure in identifying management units for conservation. Therefore, this risk should be carefully assessed when planning population genetic studies of cetaceans.
机译:分子技术的进步使人们能够在许多不同的背景下研究遗传多样性和种群结构。评估鲸类种群遗传结构的研究经常使用自由放养的个体的活检样本和滞留动物或纠缠于渔业或水产养殖设备的个体的组织样本。这就提出了这样一个问题,即关于被困或被纠缠的动物的位置相对于其自然范围的代表性如何,以及在对种群结构进行研究时,将cas体样品与自由放养的个体的样品进行比较时,是否会获得类似的结果。在这里,我们使用来自南澳大利亚因兼捕而搁浅或死亡的海豚尸体的组织样本,调查两种物种的空间种群结构:沿海宽吻海豚(Tursiops sp。)和短喙普通海豚(Delphinus delphis)。我们将这些结果与先前从同一地区的活体采样海豚样本中获得的结果进行比较,以测试test体样品是否产生相似的遗传变异和种群结构模式。使用七个微卫星标记和线粒体DNA控制区域的片段收集了来自海豚尸体的数据。仅基于car体样品的分析未能检测出Tursiops sp。的遗传结构,Tursiops sp。先前显示该物种在该区域的小空间范围内显示出有限的扩散和适度的遗传分化。但是,D。delphis(先前显示该物种在相似地理区域具有降低的遗传结构)正确地推断出其遗传结构。我们建议,在缺乏确凿数据的情况下,并且在相对较小的空间尺度上评估种群结构时,仅使用of体可能会导致低估遗传分化。这可能导致无法确定要保护的管理单位。因此,在规划鲸类种群遗传研究时应仔细评估这种风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号