首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Photomedicine and Laser Surgery >In Vitro Bactericidal Effects of 625 525 and 425 nm Wavelength (Red Green and Blue) Light-Emitting Diode Irradiation
【2h】

In Vitro Bactericidal Effects of 625 525 and 425 nm Wavelength (Red Green and Blue) Light-Emitting Diode Irradiation

机译:625、525和425 nm波长(红色绿色和蓝色)发光二极管的体外杀菌作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship of 625, 525, and 425 nm wavelengths, providing average power output and effects on three common pathogenic bacteria. >Background >data: Ultraviolet (UV) light kills bacteria, but the bactericidal effects of UV may not be unique, as 425 nm produces a similar effect. The bactericidal effects of light-emitting diode (LED) wavelengths such as 625 and 525 nm have not been described. Before conducting clinical trials, the appropriate wavelength with reasonable dose and exposure time should be established. >Materials and methods: The bactericidal effects of 625, 525, and 425 nm wavelength LED irradiation were investigated in vitro for the anaerobic bacterium Porphyromonas gingivalis and two aerobes (Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli DH5α). Average power output was 6 mW/cm2 for 1 h. The bacteria were exposed to LED irradiation for 1, 2, 4, and 8 h (21.6, 43.2, 86.4, and 172.8 J/cm2, respectively). LED irradiation was performed during growth on agar and in broth. Control bacteria were incubated without LED irradiation. Bacterial growth was expressed in colony-forming units (CFU) and at an optical density at 600 nm in agar and broth. >Results: The bactericidal effect of LED phototherapy depended upon wavelength, power density, bacterial viable number, and bacteria species. The bactericidal effect of 425 and 525 nm irradiation varied depending upon the bacterial inoculation, compared with unirradiated samples and samples irradiated with red light. Especially, P. gingivalis and E. coli DH5α were killed by 425 nm, and S. aureus growth was inhibited by 525 nm. However, the wavelength of 625 nm was not bactericidal for P. gingivalis, E. coli DH5α, or S. aureus. >Conclusions: Irradiation at 625 nm light was not bactericidal to S. aureus, E. coli, and P. gingivalis, whereas wavelengths of 425 and 525 nm had bactericidal effects. S. aureus was also killed at 525 nm.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估625、525和425 nm波长之间的关系,从而提供平均功率输出以及对三种常见病原菌的影响。 >背景 >数据:紫外线(UV)可以杀死细菌,但是UV的杀菌作用可能不是唯一的,因为425nm产生的效果相似。尚未描述诸如625和525 nm之类的发光二极管(LED)的杀菌作用。在进行临床试验之前,应确定具有合理剂量和暴露时间的适当波长。 >材料和方法:在体外研究了625、525和425nm波长的LED辐照对厌氧细菌牙龈卟啉单胞菌和两种需氧菌(金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌DH5α)的杀菌作用。平均功率输出为6 mW / cm 2 1 h。将细菌暴露于LED辐射下1、2、4和8 h(分别为21.6、43.2、86.4和172.8 J / cm 2 )。在琼脂和肉汤中生长期间进行LED照射。对照细菌在没有LED照射的情况下进行孵育。细菌生长以琼脂和肉汤中的菌落形成单位(CFU)表示,并以600 atnm的光密度表达。 >结果: LED光疗的杀菌效果取决于波长,功率密度,细菌存活数和细菌种类。与未经辐照的样品和经红光辐照的样品相比,425和525 nm辐照的杀菌效果随细菌接种量的不同而不同。尤其是牙龈卟啉单胞菌和大肠杆菌DH5α被425nm杀死,金黄色葡萄球菌的生长被525nm抑制。但是,625 nm的波长对牙龈卟啉单胞菌,大肠杆菌DH5α或金黄色葡萄球菌没有杀菌作用。 >结论:在625 nm的光照射对 S没有杀菌作用。金黄色 E。 P。牙龈炎,而425和525 nm的波长具有杀菌作用。 S。在525nm处也杀死了金黄色

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号