首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Oxford Open >1061. Comparison of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II Score and the Pitt Bacteremia Score to Predict Mortality in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
【2h】

1061. Comparison of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II Score and the Pitt Bacteremia Score to Predict Mortality in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

机译:1061.急性生理和慢性健康评估(APACHE)II评分与皮特细菌血症评分的比较以预测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌细菌血症的死亡率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (MRSA BSI) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The prediction of outcomes may have a profound impact on clinical decision making and risk stratification. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II Score and the Pitt Bacteremia Score (PBS) have been repeatedly described as independent predictors of mortality in MRSA BSI. The APACHE II is complex to calculate and many of the variables may not be pertinent to MRSA BSI. The PBS is a simple score using readily assessable variables. The comparative predictive performance of the two models in MRSA BSI has not been evaluated.
机译:背景耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染(MRSA BSI)与高发病率和高死亡率相关。结果的预测可能会对临床决策和风险分层产生深远影响。急性生理和慢性健康评估(APACHE)II评分和皮特细菌血症评分(PBS)被重复描述为MRSA BSI死亡率的独立预测因子。 APACHE II的计算很复杂,许多变量可能与MRSA BSI不相关。 PBS是使用容易评估的变量的简单评分。尚未评估这两种模型在MRSA BSI中的比较预测性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号