首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>NPG Open Access >Diabetes and CVD risk during angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker treatment in hypertension: a study of 15 990 patients
【2h】

Diabetes and CVD risk during angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker treatment in hypertension: a study of 15 990 patients

机译:高血压患者接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂治疗期间的糖尿病和CVD风险:一项15至990例患者的研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Differences in clinical effectiveness between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in the primary treatment of hypertension are unknown. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess the prevention of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients treated with ARBs or ACEis. Patients initiated on enalapril or candesartan treatment in 71 Swedish primary care centers between 1999 and 2007 were included. Medical records data were extracted and linked with nationwide hospital discharge and cause of death registers. The 11 725 patients initiated on enalapril and 4265 on candesartan had similar baseline characteristics. During a mean follow-up of 1.84 years, 36 482 patient-years, the risk of new diabetes onset was lower in the candesartan group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69–0.96, P=0.01) compared with the enalapril group. No difference between the groups was observed in CVD risk (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87–1.13, P=0.86). More patients discontinued treatment in the enalapril group (38.1%) vs the candesartan group (27.2%). In a clinical setting, patients initiated on candesartan treatment had a lower risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes and lower rates of drug discontinuation compared with patients initiated on enalapril. No differences in CVD risk were observed.
机译:高血压的主要治疗方法中,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEis)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)之间的临床疗效差异尚不清楚。这项回顾性队列研究的目的是评估ARBs或ACEis治疗的2型糖尿病和心血管疾病(CVD)的预防。包括1999年至2007年间在71个瑞典初级保健中心接受依那普利或坎地沙坦治疗的患者。提取了病历数据,并将其与全国范围的医院出院和死亡原因相关联。依那普利组和坎地沙坦组分别有11例和725例患者基线特征相似,分别为11例和725例患者。在平均随访时间为1.84年(36 482患者年)中,坎地沙坦组新发糖尿病的风险较低(危险比(HR)0.81,95%置信区间(CI)0.69-0.96,P = 0.01 )与依那普利组比较。两组之间的CVD风险无差异(HR 0.99,95%CI 0.87-1.13,P = 0.86)。依那普利组(38.1%)比坎地沙坦组(27.2%)停止治疗的患者更多。在临床情况下,与依那普利治疗的患者相比,接受坎地沙坦治疗的患者发生新发2型糖尿病的风险较低,停药率也较低。没有观察到CVD风险的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号