首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Maney MORE Open Choice >A randomized clinical trial investigating pain associated with superelastic nickel–titanium and multistranded stainless steel archwires during the initial leveling and aligning phase of orthodontic treatment
【2h】

A randomized clinical trial investigating pain associated with superelastic nickel–titanium and multistranded stainless steel archwires during the initial leveling and aligning phase of orthodontic treatment

机译:一项随机临床试验研究在正畸治疗的初始水平和对准阶段与超弹性镍钛合金和多股不锈钢弓丝有关的疼痛

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective:To investigate and compare the effects of superelastic nickel–titanium and multistranded stainless steel archwires on pain during the initial phase of orthodontic treatment.Design:A double-blind two-arm parallel design stratified randomized clinical trial.Setting:A single centre in India between December 2010 and June 2012. A total of 96 participants (48 male and 48 females; 14.1±2.1 years old) were randomized (stratified on age, sex and initial crowding) to superelastic nickel–titanium or multistranded stainless steel archwire groups using a computer-generated allocation sequence.Methods:We compared 0.016-inch superelastic nickel–titanium and 0.0175-inch multistranded stainless steel wires in 0.022-inch slot (Roth prescription) preadjusted edgewise appliances. The follow-up period was 14 days. Outcome was assessed with a visual analogue scale at baseline and 32 pre-specified follow-up points. Data was analyzed using mixed-effects model analysis.Results:One participant was lost to follow up and 10 were excluded from the analysis due to bond failure or incomplete questionnaire answers. Ultimately, 85 participants (42 males and 43 females; 14.1±2.0 years old) were analysed for the final results. No statistically significant difference was found for overall pain [F value = 2.65, degrees of freedom (df) = 92.6; P = 0.1071]. However, compared to multistranded stainless steel wires, pain in subjects with superelastic nickel–titanium archwires was significantly greater at 12 h (t = 2.34; P = 0.0193), as well as at day 1 in the morning (t = 2.21, P = 0.0273), afternoon (t = 2.11, P = 0.0346) and at bedtime (t = 2.03, P = 0.042).Conclusion:For overall pain, there was no statistically significant difference between the two wires. However, subjects with superelastic nickel–titanium archwires had a significantly higher pain at peak level.
机译:目的:研究和比较超弹性镍钛合金和多股不锈钢弓丝在正畸治疗初期对疼痛的影响。设计:双盲两臂平行设计分层随机临床试验。印度在2010年12月至2012年6月之间。总共有96名参与者(48名男性和48名女性; 14.1±2.1岁)被随机分配(按年龄,性别和最初的拥挤程度分层),使用超弹性镍钛或多股不锈钢弓丝组方法:我们比较了在0.022英寸槽(Roth处方)预先调整的边缘器具中,0.016英寸超弹性镍钛合金丝和0.0175英寸多股不锈钢丝。随访期为14天。用视觉模拟量表在基线和32个预先指定的随访点评估结果。结果:采用混合效应模型分析法对数据进行了分析。结果:一名研究对象由于债券失败或问卷回答不完整而失去了随访,并有10名被排除在分析之外。最终,分析了85位参与者(42位男性和43位女性; 14.1±2.0岁)的最终结果。总疼痛无统计学意义[F值= 2.65,自由度(df)= 92.6; P = 0.1071]。然而,与多股不锈钢丝相比,超弹性镍钛弓丝受试者在12 h时(t significantly = 2.34; P = 0.0193)以及早晨的第一天(t = 2.21,P = (0.0273),下午(t = 2.11,P = 0.0346)和就寝时间(t = 2.03,P = 0.042)。结论:对于总体疼痛,两条线之间没有统计学上的显着差异。但是,使用超弹性镍钛弓丝的受试者在峰值时疼痛明显更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号