首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Lippincott Williams Wilkins Open Access >A Modified User-Oriented Heuristic Evaluation of a Mobile Health System for Diabetes Self-management Support
【2h】

A Modified User-Oriented Heuristic Evaluation of a Mobile Health System for Diabetes Self-management Support

机译:用于糖尿病自我管理支持的移动医疗系统的面向用户的改进启发式评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Mobile health platforms offer significant opportunities for improving diabetic self-care, but only if adequate usability exists. Expert evaluations such as heuristic evaluation can provide distinct usability information about systems. The purpose of this study was to complete a usability evaluation of a mobile health system for diabetes patients using a modified heuristic evaluation technique of (1) dual-domain experts (healthcare professionals, usability experts), (2) validated scenarios and user tasks related to patients’ self-care, and (3) in-depth severity factor ratings. Experts identified 129 usability problems with 274 heuristic violations for the system. The categories Consistency and Standards dominated at 24.1% (n = 66), followed by Match Between System and Real World at 22.3% (n = 61). Average severity ratings across system views were 2.8 (of 4), with 9.3% (n = 12) rated as catastrophic and 53.5% (n = 69) as major. The large volume of violations with severe ratings indicated clear priorities for redesign. The modified heuristic approach allowed evaluators to identify unique and important issues, including ones related to self-management and patient safety. This article provides a template for one type of expert evaluation adding to the informaticists’ toolbox when needing to conduct a fast, resource-efficient and user-oriented heuristic evaluation.
机译:移动医疗平台为改善糖尿病自我护理提供了重要机会,但前提是要有足够的可用性。诸如启发式评估之类的专家评估可以提供有关系统的独特可用性信息。这项研究的目的是使用一种改进的启发式评估技术来完成针对糖尿病患者的移动医疗系统的可用性评估:(1)双域专家(医疗保健专业人员,可用性专家),(2)经过验证的方案和与用户相关的任务病人的自我护理,以及(3)深入的严重性因素评分。专家们确定了129个可用性问题,其中274个启发式违规。一致性和标准类别占24.1%(n = 66),紧随其后的是系统与现实世界之间的匹配度为22.3%(n = 61)。系统视图的平均严重等级为2.8(4),其中9.3%(n = 12)被评为灾难性,53.5%(n = 69)为严重。大量严重违反规定的行为表明了重新设计的明确优先事项。改进的启发式方法使评估人员能够识别出独特而重要的问题,包括与自我管理和患者安全有关的问题。本文提供了一种类型的专家评估模板,可在需要进行快速,资源高效且面向用户的启发式评估时添加到信息学家的工具箱中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号