首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Lippincott Williams Wilkins Open Access >Mixed-methods development of a new patient-reported outcome instrument for chronic low back pain: part 2—The Patient Assessment for Low Back Pain–Impacts (PAL-I)
【2h】

Mixed-methods development of a new patient-reported outcome instrument for chronic low back pain: part 2—The Patient Assessment for Low Back Pain–Impacts (PAL-I)

机译:针对慢性下腰痛的新的患者报告结局工具的混合方法开发:第2部分-腰痛影响患者评估(PAL-1)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We describe qualitative and quantitative development and preliminary validation of the Patient Assessment for Low Back Pain–Impacts (PAL-I), a patient-reported outcome measure for use in chronic low back pain (cLBP) clinical trials. Concept elicitation and cognitive interviews (qualitative methods) were used to identify and refine symptom concepts. Classical test theory and Rasch measurement theory (quantitative methods) were used to evaluate item-level and scale-level performance of the PAL-I using an iterative approach between qualitative and quantitative methods. Patients with cLBP participated in concept elicitation interviews (N = 43), cognitive interviews (N = 38), and assessment of paper-to-electronic format equivalence (N = 8). A web-based sample of self-reported patients with cLBP participated in quantitative studies to evaluate preliminary (N = 598) and revised (n = 401) drafts and patients with physician-diagnosed cLBP (N = 45) participated in preliminary validation of the PAL-I. The instrument contained 9 items describing cLBP impacts (walking, sitting, standing, lifting, sleep, social activities, travelling, climbing, and body movements). Item-level performance, scale structure, and scoring seemed to be appropriate. One-week test–retest reproducibility was acceptable (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.88 [95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.94]). Convergent validity was demonstrated with PAL-I total score and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (Pearson correlation 0.82), MOS-36 Physical Functioning (−0.71), and MOS-36 Bodily Pain (−0.71). Individual item scores and total score discriminated between numeric rating scale tertile groups and painDETECT categories. Interpretation of paper and electronic administration modes was equivalent. The PAL-I demonstrated content validity and is potentially useful to assess treatment benefit in clinical trials of cLBP therapies.
机译:我们描述了针对腰痛影响的患者评估(PAL-1)的定性和定量开发以及初步验证,这是一种患者报告的用于慢性腰痛(cLBP)临床试验的结果指标。概念启发和认知访谈(定性方法)用于识别和完善症状概念。使用定性和定量方法之间的迭代方法,使用经典测试理论和Rasch测量理论(定量方法)来评估PAL-1的项目级和规模级性能。患有cLBP的患者参加了概念启发式访谈(N = 43),认知访谈(N = 38)和纸对电子格式等效性评估(N = 8)。以网络为基础的自我报告的cLBP患者样本参加了定量研究,以评估初步(N = 598)和修订版(n = 401)草稿,而医生诊断为cLBP(N = 45)的患者参加了对cLBP的初步验证。 PAL-I。该仪器包含9个描述cLBP影响的项目(步行,坐着,站立,抬起,睡觉,社交活动,旅行,攀爬和身体运动)。项目级别的绩效,规模结构和得分似乎很合适。可以接受为期一周的重测重现性(组内相关系数为0.88 [95%置信区间,0.78-0.94])。通过PAL-1总分和Roland-Morris残疾问卷(Pearson相关系数0.82),MOS-36身体机能(-0.71)和MOS-36身体疼痛(-0.71)证明了收敛效度。在数字评分量表三分位数组和painDETECT类别之间区分单个项目得分和总得分。纸张和电子管理模式的解释是等效的。 PAL-1证明了内容的有效性,并且可能在评估cLBP疗法的临床试验中对治疗的益处有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号