首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Lippincott Williams Wilkins Open Access >Optimal treatment for obsessive compulsive disorder: a randomized controlled feasibility study of the clinical-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and their combination in the management of obsessive compulsive disorder
【2h】

Optimal treatment for obsessive compulsive disorder: a randomized controlled feasibility study of the clinical-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and their combination in the management of obsessive compulsive disorder

机译:强迫症的最佳治疗:认知行为疗法选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂及其组合在强迫症治疗中的临床有效性和成本效益的随机对照可行性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Established treatments for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) include cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) medication. Combined treatment may outperform monotherapy, but few studies have investigated this. A total of 49 community-based adults with OCD were randomly assigned to CBT, SSRI, or SSRI+CBT. Sertraline (50–200 mg/day) was given as the SSRI for 52 weeks. A 16-h-manualized individual CBT was delivered over 8 weeks with four follow-up sessions. Assessors were ‘blinded’ to treatment allocation. A preliminary health economic evaluation was conducted. At week 16, combined treatment (n=13) was associated with the largest improvement, sertraline (n=7) the next largest and CBT (n=9) the smallest on the observed case analysis. The effect size (Cohen’s d) comparing the improvement in Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale on CBT versus combined treatment was −0.39 and versus sertraline was −0.27. Between 16 and 52 weeks, the greatest clinical improvement was seen with sertraline, but participant discontinuation prevented reliable analysis. Compared with sertraline, the mean costs were higher for CBT and for combined treatment. The mean Quality Adjusted Life Year scores for sertraline were 0.1823 (95% confidence interval: 0.0447–0.3199) greater than for CBT and 0.1135 (95% confidence interval: ‑0.0290–0.2560), greater than for combined treatment. Combined treatment appeared the most clinically effective option, especially over CBT, but the advantages over SSRI monotherapy were not sustained beyond 16 weeks. SSRI monotherapy was the most cost-effective. A definitive study can and should be conducted.
机译:强迫症(OCD)的既定治疗方法包括认知行为疗法(CBT)和选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)药物。联合治疗可能优于单一疗法,但很少有研究对此进行过研究。共有49位以社区为基础的成人强迫症成年人被随机分配到CBT,SSRI或SSRI + CBT。舍曲林(50-200μmg/天)作为SSRI给予52周。在8周内交付了16小时的个性化CBT,并进行了4次随访。评估者对治疗分配“视而不见”。进行了初步的卫生经济评估。在观察到的病例分析中,在第16周,联合治疗(n = 13)与最大改善相关,舍曲林(n = 7)次之,CBT(n = 9)最小。比较耶鲁·布朗强迫症量表对CBT和联合治疗的改善效果为-0.39,而对舍曲林的治疗效果为-0.27。在16到52周之间,舍曲林治疗的临床改善最大,但停用参与者后无法进行可靠的分析。与舍曲林相比,CBT和联合治疗的平均费用更高。舍曲林的平均质量调整生命年评分比CBT高0.1823(95%置信区间:0.0447-0.3199),比联合治疗高0.1135(95%置信区间:-0.0290-0.2560)。联合治疗似乎是临床上最有效的选择,尤其是与CBT相比,但与SSRI单一疗法相比,其优势并未持续超过16周。 SSRI单一疗法是最具成本效益的。可以并且应该进行确定的研究。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号