首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Virus Eradication >Crowdsourcing and community engagement: a qualitative analysis of the 2BeatHIV contest
【2h】

Crowdsourcing and community engagement: a qualitative analysis of the 2BeatHIV contest

机译:众包和社区参与:2BeatHIV竞赛的定性分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: As HIV cure research advances, it is important to engage local communities. Crowdsourcing may be an effective, bottom-up approach. Crowdsourcing contests elicit public contributions to solve problems and celebrate finalists. We examine the development of a crowdsourcing contest to understand public perspectives about HIV cure research.>Methods: We used flyers, emails, online advertisement and phone calls to recruit a convenience sample of community members to participate in focus-group discussions. Participants developed a contest name, logo and hashtag. Qualitative analysis identified emergent themes in the focus group transcripts.>Results: Seventy-one people participated in four focus groups. Emergent themes for HIV cure engagement included: (1) emphasising collective approaches to HIV cure; (2) dispelling myths to spur discussion; (3) using HIV cure as motivation for participation; and (4) using creative community engagement.>Conclusion: Crowdsourcing contests may be useful for engaging local communities, developing culturally tailored awareness campaign messaging, and encouraging the public to learn more about HIV cure research.
机译:>背景:随着艾滋病毒治疗研究的发展,与当地社区的互动非常重要。众包可能是一种有效的,自下而上的方法。众包竞赛吸引公众参与,以解决问题并庆祝决赛入围者。我们研究了一项众包竞赛的进展情况,以了解公众对艾滋病毒治疗研究的看法。>方法:我们使用传单,电子邮件,在线广告和电话招募了方便社区成员参加的焦点活动,小组讨论。参加者开发了比赛名称,徽标和标签。定性分析确定了焦点小组成绩单中出现的主题。>结果:有71个人参加了四个焦点小组。艾滋病治疗的新兴主题包括:(1)强调艾滋病治疗的集体方法; (2)消除神话以刺激讨论; (3)以治疗艾滋病为动机; >结论:“众包竞赛”可能有助于当地社区的参与,制定具有文化特色的宣传运动,并鼓励公众更多地了解艾滋病毒的治疗研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号