首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering >The effect of ‘device-in-charge’ versus ‘patient-in-charge’ supportduring robotic gait training on walking ability and balance in chronic strokesurvivors: A systematic review
【2h】

The effect of ‘device-in-charge’ versus ‘patient-in-charge’ supportduring robotic gait training on walking ability and balance in chronic strokesurvivors: A systematic review

机译:负责设备与负责患者支持的效果在机器人步态训练中对慢性卒中的步行能力和平衡进行训练幸存者:系统回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This review describes the effects of two control strategies – used in robotic gait-training devices for chronic stroke survivors – on gait speed, endurance and balance. Control strategies are classified as ‘patient-in-charge support’, where the device ‘empowers’ the patient, and ‘device-in-charge support’, where the device imposes a pre-defined movement trajectory on the patient. Studies were collected up to 24 June 2015 and were included if they presented robotic gait training in chronic stroke survivors and used outcome measures that were indexed by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. In total, 11 articles were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. Outcome measures were walking speed, endurance and balance. Pooled mean differences between pre and post measurements were calculated. No differences were found between studies that used device-in-charge support and patient-in-charge support. Training effects were small for both groups of control strategies, and none were considered to be clinically relevant as defined by the Minimal Clinically Important Difference. However, an important confounder is the short training duration among all included studies. As control strategies in robotic gait training are rapidly evolving, future research shouldtake the recommendations that are made in this review into account.
机译:这篇综述描述了两种控制策略(用于慢性中风幸存者的机器人步态训练设备)对步态速度,耐力和平衡的影响。控制策略分为“负责病人的支持”和“负责人支持的设备”,其中设备“赋予”患者权力,而“负责设备的支持”则设备对患者施加了预先定义的运动轨迹。收集的研究截止至2015年6月24日,如果这些研究针对慢性中风幸存者进行了机器人步态训练并使用了根据国际功能,残疾与健康分类进行索引的结局指标,则将其包括在内。总共包括11篇文章。使用PEDro量表评估方法学质量。结果指标是步行速度,耐力和平衡感。计算前后测量的合并平均差。在使用负责装置支持和负责病人支持的研究之间没有发现差异。两组控制策略的训练效果均很小,并且根据“最小临床重要差异”的定义,没有一个被认为与临床相关。然而,一个重要的混杂因素是所有纳入研究的培训时间短。随着机器人步态训练中控制策略的迅速发展,未来的研究应考虑到这次审查中提出的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号