首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Digital Imaging >Redefining the Practice of Peer Review Through Intelligent Automation—Part 3: Automated Report Analysis and Data Reconciliation
【2h】

Redefining the Practice of Peer Review Through Intelligent Automation—Part 3: Automated Report Analysis and Data Reconciliation

机译:通过智能自动化重新定义同行评审的实践-第3部分:自动化的报告分析和数据核对

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

One method for addressing existing peer review limitations is the assignment of peer review cases on a completely blinded basis, in which the peer reviewer would create an independent report which can then be cross-referenced with the primary reader report of record. By leveraging existing computerized data mining techniques, one could in theory automate and objectify the process of report data extraction, classification, and analysis, while reducing time and resource requirements intrinsic to manual peer review report analysis. Once inter-report analysis has been performed, resulting inter-report discrepancies can be presented to the radiologist of record for review, along with the option to directly communicate with the peer reviewer through an electronic data reconciliation tool aimed at collaboratively resolving inter-report discrepancies and improving report accuracy. All associated report and reconciled data could in turn be recorded in a referenceable peer review database, which provides opportunity for context and user-specific education and decision support.
机译:解决现有同行评审局限性的一种方法是在完全不知情的基础上分配同行评审案例,其中,同行评审员将创建一个独立的报告,然后可以与记录的主要读者报告进行交叉引用。通过利用现有的计算机化数据挖掘技术,理论上可以实现报表数据提取,分类和分析的过程的自动化和客观化,同时减少手动同行审阅报告分析固有的时间和资源要求。一旦进行了报告间分析,就可以将报告间的差异提交给放射线记录员进行审查,并可以选择通过旨在协调解决报告间差异的电子数据对账工具直接与同行审查员进行沟通并提高报告的准确性。所有相关的报告和已对帐的数据又可以记录在可参考的同行评审数据库中,该数据库提供了进行背景和针对特定用户的教育和决策支持的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号