首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Anatomy and Physiology >Why are there apes? Evidence for the co‐evolution of ape and monkey ecomorphology
【2h】

Why are there apes? Evidence for the co‐evolution of ape and monkey ecomorphology

机译:为什么有猿?猿和猴子生态形态共同进化的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Apes, members of the superfamily Hominoidea, possess a distinctive suite of anatomical and behavioral characters which appear to have evolved relatively late and relatively independently. The timing of paleontological events, extant cercopithecine and hominoid ecomorphology and other evidence suggests that many distinctive ape features evolved to facilitate harvesting ripe fruits among compliant terminal branches in tree edges. Precarious, unpredictably oriented, compliant supports in the canopy periphery require apes to maneuver using suspensory and non‐sterotypical postures (i.e. postures with eccentric limb orientations or extreme joint excursions). Diet differences among extant species, extant species numbers and evidence of cercopithecoid diversification and expansion, in concert with a reciprocal decrease in hominoid species, suggest intense competition between monkeys and apes over the last 20 Ma. It may be that larger body masses allow great apes to succeed in contest competitions for highly desired food items, while the ability of monkeys to digest antifeedant‐rich unripe fruits allows them to win scramble competitions. Evolutionary trends in morphology and inferred ecology suggest that as monkeys evolved to harvest fruit ever earlier in the fruiting cycle they broadened their niche to encompass first more fibrous, tannin‐ and toxin‐rich unripe fruits and later, for some lineages, mature leaves. Early depletion of unripe fruit in the central core of the tree canopy by monkeys leaves a hollow sphere of ripening fruits, displacing antifeedant‐intolerant, later‐arriving apes to small‐diameter, compliant terminal branches. Hylobatids, orangutans, Pan species, gorillas and the New World atelines may have each evolved suspensory behavior independently in response to local competition from an expanding population of monkeys. Genetic evidence of rapid evolution among chimpanzees suggests that adaptations to suspensory behavior, vertical climbing, knuckle‐walking, consumption of terrestrial piths and intercommunity violence had not yet evolved or were still being refined when panins (chimpanzees and bonobos) and hominins diverged.
机译:猿是超人猿亚科的成员,拥有一套独特的解剖和行为特征,它们似乎发展得相对较晚且相对独立。古生物学事件发生的时间,现存的cercopithecine和类人猿的生态形态以及其他证据表明,许多独特的猿类特征已进化为促进在树边缘顺应的末端分支中收获成熟果实。冠层外围不稳定,不可预测的顺应性支撑物要求猿类使用悬吊和非定型姿势(即具有偏心肢体姿势或极端关节偏移的姿势)进行操纵。现存物种之间的饮食差异,现存物种数量以及类胡萝卜素类多样化和扩张的证据,再加上类人动物物种的倒数减少,表明猴子和猿类在最近的20Ma内竞争激烈。可能是更大的体重使大猩猩在争夺高度期望的食物的竞赛中获得成功,而猴子消化富含反饲料的未成熟水果的能力使它们赢得了争夺竞赛的胜利。形态学和推测生态学的进化趋势表明,随着猴子在结实周期中更早地收获果实,它们扩大了生态位,涵盖了首先富含纤维,单宁和毒素的未成熟果实,后来包括某些谱系的成熟叶片。猴子在树冠中央的早期耗尽了未成熟的果实,留下了一个正在成熟的果实的空心球,将拒食的,不能耐受的猿猴移到了小直径的顺应性末端分支上。鳞翅目,猩猩,泛物种,大猩猩和新世界的食蚁兽可能各自独立地发展了悬吊行为,以响应不断增长的猴子种群的局部竞争。黑猩猩之间快速进化的遗传学证据表明,当panins(黑猩猩和bo黑猩猩)和人猿发生分歧时,对悬吊行为,垂直攀爬,指关节行走,食用地面髓和社区间暴力的适应性尚未进化或仍在完善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号