首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Care Financing Review >Rural and Urban Differentials in Medicare Home Health Use
【2h】

Rural and Urban Differentials in Medicare Home Health Use

机译:医保家庭卫生使用中的城乡差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article addresses whether the use of Medicare home health services differs systematically for rural and urban beneficiaries. It draws on Medicare data bases from 1983, 1985, and 1987, including the Health Insurance Skeleton Write-Off (HISKEW) files and the Home Health Agency (HHA) 40-percent Bill Skeleton files. It presents background information on rural and urban beneficiaries and contrasts the use rates, visit levels and profiles, episodes of home health use, and primary diagnoses in rural and urban areas. The results point to higher home health use rates in urban areas and to a narrowing of the urban-rural use differential from 1983 to 1987. Rural home health users receive on average three more visits than their urban counterparts, with many more skilled nursing and home health aide visits. However, rural enrollees are much less likely than urban enrollees to receive medical social service or therapeutic visits, even after controlling for primary diagnosis. These findings point to the need for further analysis to understand the consequences of these differences.
机译:本文探讨了针对农村和城市受益人的医疗保险家庭医疗服务的使用是否系统地不同。它利用了1983年,1985年和1987年的Medicare数据库,包括健康保险骨架注销(HISKEW)文件和家庭健康局(HHA)40%的Bill Skeleton文件。它提供了有关农村和城市受益人的背景信息,并对比了农村和城市地区的使用率,访问水平和概况,家庭卫生使用情况以及主要诊断。结果表明,城市地区的家庭保健使用率更高,并且从1983年到1987年,城乡使用差异有所缩小。农村家庭保健用户的平均访问次数比城市家庭多3次,而熟练的护理和家庭则要多得多卫生助手访问。但是,即使在控制初诊后,农村入学者接受医疗社会服务或治疗访问的可能性也远低于城市入学者。这些发现表明需要进一步分析以了解这些差异的后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号