首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Public Health >Improved Properties of the Big Five Inventory and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in the Expanded Format Relative to the Likert Format
【2h】

Improved Properties of the Big Five Inventory and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in the Expanded Format Relative to the Likert Format

机译:相对于李克特格式,五种量表的改进特性和罗森伯格自尊量表的扩展格式

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous research by proposed an alternative scale format to the Likert scale format: the Expanded format. Scale items in the Expanded format present both positively worded and negatively worded sentences as response options for each scale item; therefore, they were less affected by the acquiescence bias and method effects that often occur in the Likert scale items. The major goal of the current study is to further demonstrate the superiority of the Expanded format to the Likert format across different psychological scales. Specifically, we aim to replicate the findings of Zhang and Savalei and to determine whether order effect exists in the Expanded format scales. Six psychological scales were examined in the study, including the five subscales of the big five inventory (BFI) and the Rosenberg self-esteem (RSE) scale. Four versions were created for each psychological scale. One version was the original scale in the Likert format. The other three versions were in different Expanded formats that varied in the order of the response options. For each scale, the participant was randomly assigned to complete one scale version. Across the different versions of each scale, we compared the factor structures and the distributions of the response options. Our results successfully replicated the findings of Zhang and Savalei, and also showed that order effect was generally absent in the Expanded format scales. Based on these promising findings, we encourage researchers to use the Expanded format for these and other scales in their substantive research.
机译:以前的研究提出了一种替代李克特量表格式的替代量表格式:扩展格式。扩展格式的比例尺项目同时显示肯定和否定的句子,作为每个比例尺项目的响应选项;因此,他们受Likert量表项目中经常发生的默认偏差和方法影响的影响较小。本研究的主要目的是进一步证明扩展格式在不同心理量表上优于李克特格式。具体而言,我们旨在复制Zhang和Savalei的发现,并确定扩展格式量表中是否存在顺序效应。在研究中检查了六个心理量表,包括大五库存(BFI)的五个子量表和罗森伯格自尊(RSE)量表。为每个心理量表创建了四个版本。一种版本是Likert格式的原始音阶。其他三个版本采用不同的扩展格式,这些格式按响应选项的顺序变化。对于每个量表,将参与者随机分配为完成一个量表版本。在每种量表的不同版本中,我们比较了因子结构和响应选项的分布。我们的结果成功地复制了Zhang和Savalei的发现,并且还表明在扩展格式量表中通常没有顺序效应。基于这些令人鼓舞的发现,我们鼓励研究人员在他们的实质研究中对这些和其他量表使用扩展格式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号