首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Public Health >Bridging Political Divides: Perceived Threat and Uncertainty Avoidance Help Explain the Relationship Between Political Ideology and Immigrant Attitudes Within Diverse Intergroup Contexts
【2h】

Bridging Political Divides: Perceived Threat and Uncertainty Avoidance Help Explain the Relationship Between Political Ideology and Immigrant Attitudes Within Diverse Intergroup Contexts

机译:弥合政治分歧:感知到的威胁和不确定性回避有助于解释不同群体间背景下政治意识形态与移民态度之间的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The political divide between liberals and conservatives has become quite large and stable, and there appear to be many reasons for disagreements on a wide range of issues. The current research sought to explain these divides and to extend the Uncertainty-Threat Model to intergroup relations, which predicts that more dispositional, perceived-threat and uncertainty-avoidance will be related to more political conservatism. Given that conservatism is also often related to more negativity to low-status groups such as immigrants, the relationship between political ideology and negative attitudes toward immigrants may be mediated by more threat and uncertainty-avoidance. Study 1 tested this mediational hypothesis in a correlational design and showed that both uncertainty-avoidance and perceived realistic and symbolic threat significantly mediated the relationship between political ideology and attitudes toward immigrants, and that perceived threat was the more influential mediator. Study 2 extended threat management to perceived threats from unspecified outgroups, as opposed to the immigrant outgroup, and it replicated all significant mediations. Study 3 replicated the mediations observed in Studies 1 and 2 for political ideology to attitudes toward immigrants with uncertainty-avoidance and perceived threat from immigrants as mediators; it further replicated the mediations to the negative attitudes measure that had been used in Study 2 and it extended it to an objective and indirect bias measure [i.e., Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP)]. Overall, almost all of the results supported the idea that perceived threat and uncertainty-avoidance both mediate the relationship between political ideology and attitudes toward immigrants, and that threat management, as opposed to negativity bias, may be a central concern separating liberals and conservatives. Within all three studies, we also observed more evidence for the Uncertainty-Threat Model predictions than we did for the alternative Extremity Hypothesis, which predicted a quadratic relationship between political ideology and threat and uncertainty, and between political ideology and attitudes toward immigrants.
机译:自由主义者和保守主义者之间的政治鸿沟已经变得相当大和稳定,在许多问题上似乎有许多分歧的原因。当前的研究试图解释这些分歧,并将不确定性威胁模型扩展到群体间关系,该模型预测更多的性格,威胁和避免不确定性将与更多的政治保守主义有关。鉴于保守主义通常还与对低地位群体(例如移民)的否定性更大有关,因此政治意识形态与对移民的消极态度之间的关系可能会受到更多威胁和避免不确定性的影响。研究1在相关性设计中检验了这种中介假设,结果表明,避免不确定性和感知到的现实和象征性威胁都显着地介导了政治意识形态和对移民态度之间的关系,而感知到的威胁是更具影响力的中介者。研究2将威胁管理扩展到了来自未指定群体(而不是移民群体)的感知威胁,并复制了所有重要的中介。研究3重复了研究1和2中观察到的关于政治意识形态的调解,以调解对不确定性回避的移民的态度,并认为移民作为调解人受到威胁。它进一步将调解复制为研究2中使用的否定态度测度,并将其扩展为客观和间接的偏见测度[即,影响错误归因程序(AMP)]。总的来说,几乎所有的结果都支持这样一种观点,即认为威胁和避免不确定性都可以调解政治意识形态和对移民态度之间的关系,与否定性偏见相反,威胁管理可能是将自由派和保守派分开的主要关注点。在所有这三项研究中,我们还发现了不确定性威胁模型预测的证据比替代性极端假设的证据更多,后者预测了政治意识形态与威胁与不确定性之间以及政治意识形态与移民态度之间的二次关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号