首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Public Health >Diazepam Reduces Escape and Increases Closed-Arms Exploration in Gerbils After 5 min in the Elevated Plus-Maze
【2h】

Diazepam Reduces Escape and Increases Closed-Arms Exploration in Gerbils After 5 min in the Elevated Plus-Maze

机译:在高架迷宫中经过5分钟后,地西p减少了逃逸并增加了沙鼠的密闭武器探索

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite the wide implementation of the elevated plus-maze (EPM) test to assess anxiety-related behaviors in rodents, the interpretation of these measures in gerbils has received limited attention. Here, male gerbils were treated with vehicle or diazepam, followed by a 20-min EPM session. EPM data were subjected to minute-by-minute, 5-min bins and factor analyses. During the first 5-min, gerbils avoided the closed arms in favor of the open arms and diazepam increased open-arms entries; furthermore, a single factor (escape behavior) explained all the analyzed measures. Only after 5-min, gerbils reduced open-arms exploration and three independent factors emerged for each subsequent 5-min bin. These findings suggest that EPM data from gerbils should be analyzed in at least two 5-min bins. Measures from the standard 5-min session seem to be related to an escape response from the EPM through the open arms. Once habituated, measures from the second 5-min bin seem to be related to a conflictive situation: keep trying to escape unsuccessfully (due to open-arms height) or seek protection in the closed arms (unsafe places). Diazepam seems to reduce this conflict by mitigating the escape response (Factor 1 – Anxiety) and increasing closed-arms approach (Factor 2) and risk assessment (Factor 3). Unlike mice and rats, a decrease in open-arms exploration and an increase in risk assessment could be interpreted as an anxiolytic-like effect in gerbils.
机译:尽管高架迷宫(EPM)测试广泛用于评估啮齿类动物与焦虑相关的行为,但在沙鼠中对这些措施的解释却很少受到关注。在这里,用媒介物或地西epa治疗雄性沙鼠,然后进行20分钟的EPM疗程。 EPM数据每分钟,每分钟5分钟进行分类和因子分析。在头5分钟内,沙鼠避开了密闭武器,转而使用张开双臂,地西epa增加了张开双臂的进入;此外,一个因素(逃逸行为)解释了所有分析的措施。仅在5分钟之后,沙鼠就减少了张开双臂的探索,随后每5分钟就出现了三个独立因素。这些发现表明,应在至少两个5分钟的分箱中分析来自沙鼠的EPM数据。标准5分钟会议的措施似乎与EPM通过张开双臂逃脱反应有关。一旦习惯了,从第二个5分钟的垃圾箱采取的措施似​​乎与一个冲突的情况有关:继续尝试失败逃脱(由于张开双臂的高度)或在封闭的武器中寻求保护(不安全的地方)。地西p似乎通过减轻逃生反应(因素1 –焦虑)和增加闭合双臂方法(因素2)和风险评估(因素3)来减少这种冲突。与小鼠和大鼠不同,张开双臂探索的减少和风险评估的增加可以解释为沙鼠的抗焦虑样作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号