首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychology >Time Is Not More Abstract Than Space in Sound
【2h】

Time Is Not More Abstract Than Space in Sound

机译:时间比声音中的空间更抽象

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Time is talked about in terms of space more frequently than the other way around. Some have suggested that this asymmetry runs deeper than language. The idea that we think about abstract domains (like time) in terms of relatively more concrete domains (like space) but not vice versa can be traced to Conceptual Metaphor Theory. This theoretical account has some empirical support. Previous experiments suggest an embodied basis for space-time asymmetries that runs deeper than language. However, these studies frequently involve verbal and/or visual stimuli. Because vision makes a privileged contribution to spatial processing it is unclear whether these results speak to a general asymmetry between time and space based on each domain’s general level of relative abstractness, or reflect modality-specific effects. The present study was motivated by this uncertainty and what appears to be audition’s privileged contribution to temporal processing. In Experiment 1, using an auditory perceptual task, temporal duration and spatial displacement were shown to be mutually contagious. Irrelevant temporal information influenced spatial judgments and vice versa with a larger effect of time on space. Experiment 2 examined the mutual effects of space, time, and pitch. Pitch was investigated because it is a fundamental characteristic of sound perception. It was reasoned that if space is indeed less relevant to audition than time, then spatial distance judgments should be more easily contaminated by variations in auditory frequency, while variations in distance should be less effective in contaminating pitch perception. While time and pitch were shown to be mutually contagious in Experiment 2, irrelevant variation in auditory frequency affected estimates of spatial distance while variations in spatial distance did not affect pitch judgments. Results overall suggest that the perceptual asymmetry between spatial and temporal domains does not necessarily generalize across modalities, and that time is not generally more abstract than space.
机译:关于空间的讨论时间要比反之多。一些人认为这种不对称性比语言更深。我们以相对更具体的领域(例如空间)来思考抽象领域(例如时间),但反之则不这样的想法可以追溯到概念隐喻理论。该理论说明具有一定的经验支持。先前的实验表明,时空不对称性的体现基础要深于语言。但是,这些研究经常涉及言语和/或视觉刺激。由于视觉对空间处理做出了特权贡献,因此尚不清楚这些结果是否表示出基于每个域相对抽象性的一般水平在时间和空间之间的普遍不对称性,还是反映了特定于模态的效果。本研究的动机是这种不确定性,这似乎是试听对时间处理的特权。在实验1中,使用听觉感知任务,时间持续时间和空间位移显示为相互传染的。不相关的时间信息会影响空间判断,反之亦然,时间对空间的影响更大。实验2检验了空间,时间和音高的相互影响。对音调进行了研究,因为它是声音感知的基本特征。有理由认为,如果空间与听觉的相关性确实不如时间,那么空间距离的判断应该更容易受到听觉频率变化的污染,而距离的变化对污染音高的感知则不太有效。尽管在实验2中时间和音调相互传染,但听觉频率的不相关变化影响了空间距离的估计,而空间距离的变化不影响音调判断。总体而言,结果表明,时域之间的感知不对称并不一定会跨模态普遍化,并且时间通常不比空间更抽象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号