首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Physiology >Effectiveness of Traditional Strength vs. Power Training on Muscle Strength Power and Speed with Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【2h】

Effectiveness of Traditional Strength vs. Power Training on Muscle Strength Power and Speed with Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:传统力量与力量训练对青少年肌肉力量力量和速度的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Numerous national associations and multiple reviews have documented the safety and efficacy of strength training for children and adolescents. The literature highlights the significant training-induced increases in strength associated with youth strength training. However, the effectiveness of youth strength training programs to improve power measures is not as clear. This discrepancy may be related to training and testing specificity. Most prior youth strength training programs emphasized lower intensity resistance with relatively slow movements. Since power activities typically involve higher intensity, explosive-like contractions with higher angular velocities (e.g., plyometrics), there is a conflict between the training medium and testing measures. This meta-analysis compared strength (e.g., training with resistance or body mass) and power training programs (e.g., plyometric training) on proxies of muscle strength, power, and speed. A systematic literature search using a Boolean Search Strategy was conducted in the electronic databases PubMed, SPORT Discus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar and revealed 652 hits. After perusal of title, abstract, and full text, 107 studies were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed small to moderate magnitude changes for training specificity with jump measures. In other words, power training was more effective than strength training for improving youth jump height. For sprint measures, strength training was more effective than power training with youth. Furthermore, strength training exhibited consistently large magnitude changes to lower body strength measures, which contrasted with the generally trivial, small and moderate magnitude training improvements of power training upon lower body strength, sprint and jump measures, respectively. Maturity related inadequacies in eccentric strength and balance might influence the lack of training specificity with the unilateral landings and propulsions associated with sprinting. Based on this meta-analysis, strength training should be incorporated prior to power training in order to establish an adequate foundation of strength for power training activities.
机译:许多国家协会和多次审查已记录了对儿童和青少年进行力量训练的安全性和有效性。文献强调了与青年力量训练有关的训练导致的力量显着增加。但是,改善力量措施的青年力量训练计划的有效性尚不清楚。这种差异可能与培训和测试的特异性有关。以前的大多数青年力量训练计划都强调较低的强度阻力以及相对较慢的运动。由于力量活动通常涉及强度更高,爆炸性的收缩以及更高的角速度(例如,等高线),因此训练介质和测试方法之间存在冲突。这项荟萃分析比较了关于肌肉力量,力量和速度的力量(例如,进行阻力或体重训练)和力量训练程序(例如,体能训练)。在电子数据库PubMed,SPORT Discus,Web of Science和Google Scholar中进行了使用布尔搜索策略的系统文献搜索,发现了652个匹配项。在仔细阅读标题,摘要和全文之后,有107项研究符合纳入此系统评价和荟萃分析的资格。荟萃分析显示,跳跃训练对训练特异性的影响范围从小到中等。换句话说,力量训练比力量训练在改善青年跳高上更有效。在短跑方面,力量训练比青年力量训练更为有效。此外,力量训练对下半身力量的测量值表现出持续的大幅度变化,这与分别对下半身力量,短跑和跳跃动作的力量训练的一般琐碎,小幅度和中等幅度的训练形成对比。与成熟有关的偏心力量和平衡不足可能会影响与短跑相关的单侧着陆和推进的训练特异性的缺乏。基于此荟萃分析,应该在力量训练之前加入力量训练,以便为力量训练活动建立足够的力量基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号