首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Pharmacology >The Optimal Chinese Herbal Injections for Use With Radiotherapy to Treat Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
【2h】

The Optimal Chinese Herbal Injections for Use With Radiotherapy to Treat Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

机译:放射治疗食管癌的最佳中草药注射剂:系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Ethnopharmacological relevance: Esophageal cancer is one of the most common human cancers, and its incidence is highly endemic in China. The combination of Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) and radiotherapy should be informed by the best available evidence.Aim of the study: To update and expand on previous work in order to compare and rank the efficacy and safety of CHIs in combination with radiotherapy to treat esophageal cancer.Materials and Methods: We searched several electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding CHIs to treat esophageal cancer from their inception to March 15, 2017. In a network meta-analysis (NMA), the bias of the included trials was assessed by two individuals independently in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Outcomes such as the clinical effectiveness rate, performance status, adverse reactions (ADRs), and survival rate were evaluated. We performed a random-effects NMA to obtain estimates of efficacy and safety outcomes, and we present these estimates as odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated via Stata 13.1 and WinBUGS 1.4 software. Furthermore, the surface under cumulative the ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank the efficacy and safety of different CHIs in relation to each outcome.Results: Of 685 identified trials, 55 were eligible for inclusion in the study. These 55 trials included 12 CHIs and 4,114 participants. The cluster analysis results suggested that Compound kushen injection therapy is the optimal CHI treatment for patients with esophageal cancer in terms of improving the clinical effectiveness rate and performance status. Huachansu and Kangai injection are superior in improving 1-year and 2-year survival rates. Lentinan injection may be considered a favorable choice for reliving ADRs, and Compound kushen injection may provide treatment benefits by reducing both gastrointestinal reaction and radiation esophagitis.Conclusions: The current clinical evidence indicated that Compound kushen injection combined with radiotherapy is the most preferable and beneficial option for patients with esophageal cancer in terms of efficacy and safety. However, the results of our study should be interpreted with caution given the limitations of the sample size and the methodological quality of the included trials.
机译:民族药理学关联性:食道癌是人类最常见的癌症之一,在中国其发病率很高。应从最佳可用证据中了解中药注射剂(CHIs)与放射疗法的结合。研究目的:要更新和扩展以前的工作,以便比较和分级安乐死的疗效和安全性CHI与放疗相结合治疗食管癌的方法。材料和方法:我们从几个电子数据库中检索了关于从CHICHI成立至2017年3月15日治疗CHI的食管癌的随机对照试验(RCT)。在网络荟萃分析(NMA)中,纳入的试验的偏倚由两名患者根据Cochrane系统干预回顾手册独立评估。评价诸如临床有效率,表现状态,不良反应(ADR)和生存率等结果。我们执行了随机效应NMA以获得疗效和安全性结果的估计值,并将这些估计值表示为通过Stata 13.1和WinBUGS 1.4软件计算的比值比(OR)和相应的95%置信区间(CI)。此外,使用累积排名曲线下的表面(SUCRA)来针对每个结局对不同CHI的功效和安全性进行排名。结果:在685个已确定的试验中,有55个符合纳入条件研究。这55个试验包括12个CHI和4,114名参与者。聚类分析结果表明,复方苦参注射液从提高临床有效率和性能状态来看,是食管癌患者最佳的CHI治疗方法。 Huachansu和Kangai注射液在提高1年和2年生存率方面具有优势。慢病毒注射液可能被认为是缓解ADR的理想选择,复方苦参注射液可通过减少胃肠道反应和放射性食管炎而提供治疗益处。结论:目前的临床证据表明,复方苦参注射液与放疗相结合就疗效和安全性而言,是食道癌患者最优选和有益的选择。但是,鉴于样本量和所纳入试验的方法学质量的局限性,我们的研究结果应谨慎解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号