首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Oncology >Clinical Outcomes of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Following Intracavitary/Interstitial Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer: A Single Institution Retrospective Experience
【2h】

Clinical Outcomes of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Following Intracavitary/Interstitial Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer: A Single Institution Retrospective Experience

机译:腔内/间质近距离放射治疗宫颈癌后进行容积式电弧治疗的临床结果:单机构回顾性经验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate treatment outcomes and toxicity in patients with cervical cancer (CC) treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), followed by three-dimensional high-dose-rate intracavity combined with interstitial brachytherapy (IC/IS BT) compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment.Materials and Methods: A total of 398 patients with stage IA–IVB CC treated with definitive radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed (331 VMAT and 67 IMRT). A total prescription dose of 45–50 Gy was delivered to pelvic field with VMAT/IMRT in 25/28 fractions, with five fractions per week. Every patient further received IC/IS BT for four to six 6.0-Gy fractions. Local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were calculated. Acute hematotoxicity and late toxicity were recorded.Results: The median follow-up period was 25.47 (range, 0.93–58.93) months for the VMAT and 35.07 (4.8–90.37) months for IMRT. The 3-year OS, DFS, LC, and DMFS rate were 80.5, 65.4, 88.7, and 78.1% in VMAT group, and 76.2, 76.4, 83.1, and 86.1% in the IMRT group, respectively. No significant differences were found between VMAT and IMRT groups for OS, DFS, LC, and DMFS rate. However, patients in the VMAT group had lower incidence of chronic enterocolitis complication (26.6 vs. 38.8%, p = 0.004). In addition, a total of 3 (0.9%) patients developed grade 3 chronic cystitis, and 7 (2.1%) patients developed grade 3 or greater chronic enterocolitis in VMAT group.Conclusion: VMAT combined with IC/IS BT can result in satisfactory curative outcomes and low incidences of late radiation enterocolitis and cystitis in CC treatment.
机译:目的:评估采用容积调制弧光治疗(VMAT),三维高剂量率腔内联合间质近距离放射治疗(IC)的宫颈癌(CC)患者的治疗结果和毒性/ IS BT)与调强放射治疗(IMRT)进行比较。材料和方法:回顾性分析了398例IA–IVB CC明确放疗联合或不联合化疗的患者( 331 VMAT和67 IMRT)。使用VMAT / IMRT将总剂量45–50 Gy的处方药以25/28的比例送入骨盆腔,每周进行5次。每位患者还接受了4到6个6.0 Gy分数的IC / IS BT。计算局部控制(LC),无病生存期(DFS),总生存期(OS)和远处无转移生存期(DMFS)的比率。记录了急性血液毒性和晚期毒性。结果: VMAT的中位随访期为25.47(0.93-58.93)个月,IMRT的中位随访期为35.07(4.8-90.37)个月。 VMAT组的三年OS,DFS,LC和DMFS率分别为80.5%,65.4、88.7和78.1%,IMRT组分别为76.2、76.4、83.1和86.1%。在VMAT和IMRT组之间,对于OS,DFS,LC和DMFS速率没有显着差异。但是,VMAT组患者的慢性小肠结肠炎并发症发生率较低(26.6比38.8%,p = 0.004)。此外,VMAT组中共有3例(0.9%)患上3级慢性膀胱炎,7例(2.1%)患上3级或更高级别的慢性小肠结肠炎。结论: VMAT结合IC /在CC治疗中,IS BT可以产生令人满意的疗效,并且晚期放射小肠结肠炎和膀胱炎的发生率较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号