首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Oncology >Colorectal Cancer Screening Modalities in Chinese Population: Practice and Lessons in Pudong New Area of Shanghai, China
【2h】

Colorectal Cancer Screening Modalities in Chinese Population: Practice and Lessons in Pudong New Area of Shanghai, China

机译:中国人口大肠癌筛查方式:在上海浦东新区的实践和经验教训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Parallel test of risk stratification and two-sample qualitative fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are used to screen colorectal cancer (CRC) in Shanghai, China. This study was designed to identify an optimal initial screening modality based on available data.Methods: A total of 538,278 eligible residents participated in the program during the period of January 2013 to June 2017. Incident CRC was collected through program reporting system and by record linkage with the Shanghai Cancer Registry up to December 2017. Logistic regression model was applied to identify significant factors to calculate risk score for CRC. Cutoff points of risk score were determined based on Youden index and defined specificity. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPVs) were computed to evaluate validity of assumed screening modalities.Results: A total of 446 CRC were screen-detected, and 777 interval or missed cases were identified through record linkage. The risk score system had an optimal cutoff point of 19 and performed better in detecting CRC and predicting long-term CRC risk than did the risk stratification. When using a cutoff point of 24, parallel test of risk score, and FIT were expected to avoid 56 interval CRCs with minimal decrease in PPV and increase in colonoscopy. However, the observed detection rates were much lower than those expected due to low compliance to colonoscopy.Conclusions: Risk score is superior to risk stratification used in the program, particularly when combined with FIT. Compliance to colonoscopy should be improved to guarantee the effectiveness of CRC screening in the population.
机译:背景:在中国上海,采用了风险分层的平行检验和两份定性粪便免疫化学检验(FIT)来筛查大肠癌(CRC)。这项研究旨在根据可用数据确定最佳的初始筛查方式。方法:在2013年1月至2017年6月期间,共有538,278名合格居民参加了该计划。计划报告系统,并通过与上海癌症登记处的记录链接,直至2017年12月。应用Logistic回归模型来识别重要因素,以计算CRC风险评分。根据Youden指数和定义的特异性确定风险评分的临界点。计算了敏感性,特异性和阳性预测值(PPV),以评估假定的筛查方式的有效性。结果:总共筛查了446例CRC,通过记录确定了777例间隔或漏诊病例连锁。风险评分系统的最佳分界点为19,与风险分层相比,在检测CRC和预测长期CRC风险方面表现更好。当使用24的临界点时,风险评分和FIT的并行测试可以避免56个间隔CRC,而PPV的降低和结肠镜检查的增加最少。但是,由于对结肠镜检查的依从性较低,观察到的检出率远低于预期的检出率。结论:风险评分优于该计划中使用的风险分层,尤其是与FIT结合使用时。应改善对结肠镜检查的依从性,以确保在人群中进行CRC筛查的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号