首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>F1000 Biology Reports >Recent advances in mechanical ventilation in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome
【2h】

Recent advances in mechanical ventilation in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome

机译:无急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者机械通气的最新进展

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While being an essential part of general anesthesia for surgery and at times even a life-saving intervention in critically ill patients, mechanical ventilation has a strong potential to cause harm. Certain ventilation strategies could prevent, at least to some extent, the injury caused by this intervention. One essential element of so-called ‘lung-protective’ ventilation is the use of lower tidal volumes. It is uncertain whether higher levels of positive end-expiratory pressures have lung-protective properties as well. There are indications that too high oxygen fractions of inspired air, or too high blood oxygen targets, are harmful. Circumstantial evidence further suggests that spontaneous modes of ventilation are to be preferred over controlled ventilation to prevent harm to respiratory muscle. Finally, the use of restrictive sedation strategies in critically ill patients indirectly prevents ventilation-induced injury, as daily spontaneous awakening and breathing trials and bolus instead of continuous sedation are associated with shorter duration of ventilation and shorten the exposure to the injurious effects of ventilation.
机译:机械通气虽然是手术全身麻醉的重要组成部分,有时甚至是危重病人的挽救生命的干预措施,但它具有引起伤害的强大潜力。某些通气策略可以至少在某种程度上防止这种干预所造成的伤害。所谓的“肺保护”通气的基本要素之一是使用较小的潮气量。尚不确定较高水平的呼气末正压是否也具有肺保护特性。有迹象表明,吸入的空气中氧气含量过高或血液中的氧气目标过高都是有害的。间接证据进一步表明,自发通气模式优于控制通气,以防止对呼吸肌的伤害。最后,在重症患者中使用限制性镇静策略可间接预防通气诱发的伤害,因为每天自发的唤醒和呼吸试验以及推注而不是持续镇静与缩短通气时间相关联,并缩短了通气对伤害性影响的暴露时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号