首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Health Policy and Management >Decentralisation and Health Services Delivery in 4 Districts in Tanzania: How and Why Does the Use of Decision Space Vary Across Districts?
【2h】

Decentralisation and Health Services Delivery in 4 Districts in Tanzania: How and Why Does the Use of Decision Space Vary Across Districts?

机译:坦桑尼亚4个地区的权力下放与卫生服务交付:决策空间的使用方式和为何在不同地区之间会有所不同?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Decentralisation in the health sector has been promoted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) for many years. Inherently, decentralisation grants decision-making space to local level authorities over different functions such as: finance, human resources, service organization, and governance. However, there is paucity of studies which have assessed the actual use of decision-making space by local government officials within the decentralised health system. The objective of this study was to analyse the exercise of decision space across 4 districts in Tanzania and explore why variations exist amongst them. >Methods: The study was guided by the decision space framework and relied on interviews and documentary reviews. Interviews were conducted with the national, regional and district level officials; and data were analysed using thematic approach. >Results: Decentralisation has provided moderate decision space on the Community Health Fund (CHF), accounting for supplies of medicine, motivation of health workers, additional management techniques and rewarding the formally established health committees as a more effective means of community participation and management. While some districts innovated within a moderate range of choice, others were unaware of the range of choices they could utilise. Leadership skills of key district health managers and local government officials as well as horizontal relationships at the district and local levels were the key factors that accounted for the variations in the use of the decision space across districts. >Conclusion: This study concludes that more horizontal sharing of innovations among districts may contribute to more effective service delivery in the districts that did not have active leadership. Additionally, the innovations applied by the best performing districts should be incorporated in the national guidelines. Furthermore, targeted capacity building activities for the district health managers may improve decision-making abilities and in turn improve health system performance.
机译:>背景:多年来,中低收入国家(LMIC)促进了卫生部门的权力下放。从本质上讲,权力下放为地方政府在诸如财务,人力资源,服务组织和治理等不同职能上提供了决策空间。但是,很少有研究评估了分散卫生系统中地方政府官员对决策空间的实际使用。这项研究的目的是分析坦桑尼亚四个地区的决策空间,并探讨其中为何存在差异。 >方法:该研究以决策空间框架为指导,并依赖访谈和文献审查。与国家,区域和地区级官员进行了访谈;并使用主题方法分析数据。 >结果:权力下放为社区卫生基金(CHF)提供了适度的决策空间,包括药品供应,卫生工作者的积极性,其他管理技术,并奖励了正式成立的卫生委员会,作为更有效的手段社区参与和管理。尽管有些地区在适度的选择范围内进行了创新,但其他地区却没有意识到他们可以利用的选择范围。关键地区卫生经理和地方政府官员的领导才能以及地区和地方各级的横向关系是导致跨地区决策空间使用方式差异的关键因素。 >结论:该研究得出的结论是,在没有积极领导的地区中,地区之间更多地横向共享创新可能有助于更有效地提供服务。此外,表现最好的地区应采用的创新应纳入国家指南。此外,针对地区卫生经理的针对性能力建设活动可以提高决策能力,进而提高卫生系统的绩效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号