首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Health Policy and Management >The No-Destination Ship of Priority-Setting in Healthcare: A Call for More Democracy
【2h】

The No-Destination Ship of Priority-Setting in Healthcare: A Call for More Democracy

机译:在医疗领域设定优先次序的无目的地之船:呼吁更多民主

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In dealing with scarcity of resources within healthcare systems, decision-makers inevitably have to make choices about which services to fund. Setting priorities represents a challenging task that requires systematic, explicit and transparent methodologies with focus on economic efficiency. In addition, the engagement of the general public in the process of decision-making has been regarded as one of the most important aspects of the management of publicly-funded health systems in liberal democracies. In the current essay, we aim to discuss the problematics of public engagement in the process of resource allocation and priority-setting within the context of publiclyfunded health systems. Our central argument is that although there may be a conflict between democratic mechanisms of citizen participation and economic efficiency, in the extra-welfarist sense, expected for/from the system, the solution for this tension does not seem to rely on more or novel authoritative technocratic approaches, but rather on the deepening and betterment of democratic participation.
机译:在应对医疗保健系统内的资源短缺时,决策者不可避免地必须选择要资助的服务。确定优先事项是一项艰巨的任务,需要系统,明确和透明的方法论,重点放在经济效率上。此外,在民主国家,公众参与决策过程被视为管理公共资助卫生系统的最重要方面之一。在本文中,我们旨在讨论在公共资助的卫生系统的背景下,公众参与资源分配和确定优先重点过程中的问题。我们的中心论点是,尽管公民参与的民主机制与经济效率之间可能存在冲突,但从制度外期望/从平民主义的角度来说,这种紧张关系的解决方案似乎并不依赖于更多或新颖的权威性。技术官僚主义的方法,而是深化和改善民主参与的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号