首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Health Policy and Management >Stakeholder’s Assessment of the Awareness and Effectiveness of Smoke-free Law in Thailand
【2h】

Stakeholder’s Assessment of the Awareness and Effectiveness of Smoke-free Law in Thailand

机译:利益相关者对泰国无烟法律的意识和效果的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: This study reports stakeholders’ ratings, and perceived gaps in World Health Organization’s (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) Article 8 implementation in Thailand viewed against WHO’s Guidelines for Article 8 and to inform action in preparing the 2017 Tobacco Product Control Act. >Methods: Stakeholder ratings of Guideline provisions of Article 8 on a three-tiered scale of implementation from understanding to effectiveness and efficiency were used to identify gaps in enforcement and compliance important to success in meeting Article 8 goals. This stakeholder assessment occurred through a stakeholder meeting of 55 stakeholders in Bangkok, Thailand in June 2016. >Results: The average of all assessment ratings by stakeholders on an ascending 0-3 scale had a mean score of 1.67, which means the level of implementation for Article 8 in Thailand was rated less than effective for enforcement. The assessment shows that the public understanding of smoke-free principles is also poor at a mean of 1.28, that there is incomplete effectiveness of smoke-free measures with a mean of 1.75, and only a general effectiveness that smoke-free protections are adequately covering most places with a mean of 1.98. More needs to be done to make all places compliant through enforcement efforts rated with a mean of only 1, and that more is necessary for protection from tobacco-smoke exposure in other public places and in private vehicles with mean ratings of 1.71 and 1.14. >Conclusion: This stakeholder approach using a three-tiered rating scale found that the implementation of Article 8 in Thailand is still lacking. With this approach, stakeholders identified critical issues needing improvement and informed changes in the then-proposed Tobacco Product Control Act which later was adopted in 2017.
机译:>背景:该研究报告了利益相关者的评级,以及在世界卫生组织(WHO)《烟草控制框架公约》(FCTC)第8条在泰国实施方面的差距,并参考了WHO第8条指南,并为采取行动提供了信息起草《 2017年烟草制品控制法》。 >方法:利益相关者对第8条的准则条款进行了从理解到有效性和效率的三级实施规模的评分,用于识别执法和合规方面的差距,这对于成功实现第8条目标至关重要。这项利益相关者评估是通过2016年6月在泰国曼谷举行的55个利益相关者利益相关者会议上进行的。>结果:利益相关者对所有评估的平均评分以0-3递增,其平均得分为1.67,这意味着泰国第8条的实施水平被评为执行不到有效水平。评估显示,公众对无烟原则的理解也很差,平均数为1.28,无烟措施的效果不完全,平均数为1.75,只有总体上有效的无烟保护措施可以覆盖大多数地方的平均值为1.98。需要做更多的工作,以使执法场所的评分均值仅为1,使所有场所都合规。为防止其他公共场所和平均等级为1.71和1.14的私家车暴露于烟草烟雾,还需要采取更多措施。 >结论:这种采用三级评级量表的利益相关方方法发现,泰国仍缺乏对第8条的实施。通过这种方法,利益相关者确定了需要改进的关键问题,并在当时提议的《烟草产品控制法案》(该法案后来于2017年通过)中做出了知情的更改。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号