首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Health Policy and Management >Economic inequality in eye care utilization and its determinants: a Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition
【2h】

Economic inequality in eye care utilization and its determinants: a Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition

机译:眼保健利用中的经济不平等及其决定因素:Blinder-Oaxaca分解

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: The current study aimed to determine eye care utilization, to assess the role of economic inequality in the utilization of eye care services, and to identify its determinants in Shahroud, North of Iran. >Methods: Of the 6,311 invited people, 5,190 (82.24%) individuals aged 40 to 64 years old participated in the study. A history of a visit by an ophthalmologist or optometrist was considered as eye care utilization. The gap between low- and high-economic groups was decomposed into its determinants using the Oaxaca decomposition method. >Results: Among the participants, 16.32% [95% Confidence Intervals (CI)= 15.31–17.33%] had never been examined by an ophthalmologist or optometrist, and 30.94% (95% CI= 29.69–32.20%) had not undergone an eye examination in the past 5 years. This negative history was significantly higher among female subjects [Odds Ratio (OR)= 1.79, 95% CI= 1.51–2.14], the low-economic group (OR= 2.33, 95% CI= 1.90–2.87), the visually impaired (OR= 1.41, 95% CI= 1.05–1.90), and the uninsured (OR= 1.93, 95% CI= 1.45–2.58). The negative history of eye examination decreased with increasing in age (OR= 0.94, 95% CI= 0.93–0.96) and education (OR= 0.94, 95% CI= 0.92–0.96). In this study, 24.72% (95% CI= 22.30–27.14) of the low-economic group and 9.94% (95% CI= 8.75–11.14) of the high-economic group had no history of eye examination. Decomposition of the gap between the two economic groups showed that education and gender were the most important determinants of inequality. > >Conclusion: A considerable percentage of adults, even those with visual impairment, do not receive appropriate eye care. There is a definite economic inequality in the community for which poverty per se could be the major cause.
机译:>背景:当前的研究旨在确定眼保健的利用率,评估经济不平等在利用眼保健服务中的作用,并确定其在伊朗北部Shahroud的决定因素。 >方法:在6,311名受邀者中,年龄40至64岁的5,190名(82.24%)个人参加了研究。眼科医生或验光师的就诊史被认为是眼保健的利用。使用瓦哈卡(Oaxaca)分解方法,将低,高经济群体之间的差距分解为决定因素。 >结果:在参与者中,从未有过眼科医生或验光师检查过16.32%[95%置信区间(CI)= 15.31–17.33%]和30.94%(95%CI = 29.69–32.20) %)在过去5年中没有接受眼科检查。在女性受试者中,这种阴性病史明显更高[几率(OR)= 1.79,95%CI = 1.51–2.14],低经济组(OR = 2.33,95%CI = 1.90–2.87),视力障碍者( OR = 1.41,95%CI = 1.05-1.90)和未保险(OR = 1.93,95%CI = 1.45-2.58)。眼睛检查的阴性史随着年龄的增长(OR = 0.94,95%CI = 0.93-0.96)和受过教育的人群(OR = 0.94,95%CI = 0.92-0.96)而降低。在这项研究中,低经济组的24.72%(95%CI = 22.30–27.14)和高经济组的9.94%(95%CI = 8.75-11.14)没有眼睛检查的历史。对两个经济集团之间差距的分解表明,教育和性别是不平等的最重要决定因素。 > >结论:相当大的成年人,即使是视力障碍的成年人,也没有得到适当的眼保健。社区中存在一定的经济不平等,贫困本身可能是主要原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号