首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine >Propofol or Thiopental sodium in patients undergoing reproductive assisted technologies: Differences in hemodynamic recovery and outcome of oocyte retrieval: A randomized clinical trial
【2h】

Propofol or Thiopental sodium in patients undergoing reproductive assisted technologies: Differences in hemodynamic recovery and outcome of oocyte retrieval: A randomized clinical trial

机译:接受生殖辅助技术的患者中的异丙酚或硫喷妥钠钠:血液动力学恢复和卵母细胞回收结果的差异:一项随机临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Thiopental sodium and Propofol are two widely-used drugs in the induction of anesthesia in assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, the side effects and outcome of recovery from anesthesia of these drugs on ART have not been identified yet. >Objective: This study aimed at investigating the side effects and hemodynamic effects of using thiopental sodium and propofal as well as effects of these drugs on pregnancy outcome in ART cycles. >Materials and Methods: In this double blinded) randomized controlled trial, 90 woman candidate for ART were randomly divided into two groups. 47 patients received Propofol (2.5 mg/kg) and 43 patients received thiopental (5mg/kg) for anesthesia induction. The entry hemodynamic parameters of the patients were documented. During the anesthesia process, hemodynamic parameters were checked at five-minute intervals. >Results: The results of the study showed a statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of their response to verbal stimulation (p<0.001), the normalization time of the rate and quality of breathing (p<0.001), nausea (p<0.001), and vomiting (p<0.001). Also, in comparison with the other group, all these parameters were better in Propofol group. There was found no significant difference between two groups in terms of other variables. >Conclusion: Based on the findings of the study, Propofol has fewer known side effects. Vomiting and nausea as two known side effect of anesthesia are significantly lower in patients receiving Propofol than patients who received thiopental.Registration ID in IRCT: IRCT201303135393N2This article extracted from M.D. thesis. (Reza Jouya)
机译:>背景:硫喷妥钠和丙泊酚是在辅助生殖技术(ART)中诱导麻醉的两种广泛使用的药物。但是,尚未确定这些药物对ART的副作用和麻醉后恢复的结果。 >目的:该研究旨在研究使用硫喷妥钠和丙泊酚的副作用和血液动力学效应,以及这些药物对ART周期妊娠结局的影响。 >材料和方法:在这项双盲(双盲)随机对照试验中,将90名接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的女性候选人随机分为两组。 47例接受异丙酚(2.5 mg / kg)的患者和43例接受硫喷妥钠(5mg / kg)的麻醉诱导。记录患者的进入血流动力学参数。在麻醉过程中,每隔五分钟检查一次血液动力学参数。 >结果:研究结果表明,两组在对言语刺激的反应(p <0.001),呼吸频率的标准化时间和呼吸质量(p <0.001)方面有统计学意义的差异。 ),恶心(p <0.001)和呕吐(p <0.001)。而且,与其他组相比,丙泊酚组的所有这些参数都更好。在其他变量方面,两组之间没有显着差异。 >结论:根据研究结果,异丙酚的已知副作用较少。接受异丙酚的患者的呕吐和恶心是麻醉的两种已知的副作用,均比接受硫喷妥钠的患者低得多。IRCT中的注册ID:IRCT201303135393N2 (Reza Jouya)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号