首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Womens Health >Embolization of uterine fibroids from the point of view of the gynecologist: pros and cons
【2h】

Embolization of uterine fibroids from the point of view of the gynecologist: pros and cons

机译:从妇科医生的角度来看子宫肌瘤的栓塞:利弊

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a minimally invasive procedure with large symptomatic potential in treatment of women with uterine leiomyomas. Due to specificities of this method and possible complications the appropriate indication is crucial. Patient’ symptoms, age, plans for pregnancy, and surgical and reproductive history play a major role in decision-making regarding appropriate subjects for UAE. Close cooperation between the gynecologist and the interventional radiologist is necessary. UAE is usually offered as an alternative to surgical treatment. In patients with no fertility plans, it is a less invasive option than abdominal hysterectomy, with a comparable effect on fibroid-related symptoms and quality of life. The need for reintervention is markedly greater in patients after UAE (up to 35% within 5 years) than after hysterectomy. Women with large symptomatic fibroids wishing to retain the uterus and ineligible for minimally invasive (laparoscopic or vaginal) hysterectomy are good candidates for UAE. However, studies comparing UAE with minimally invasive hysterectomy are lacking. Use of UAE in younger women desiring pregnancy is more controversial, mainly because of the significant risk of miscarriage (as high as 64% in some studies) as well as the increased risk of other complications of pregnancy, such as preterm delivery, abnormal placentation, and post-partum hemorrhage. The risk of infertility or subfertility following UAE is unknown. Even poor candidates for myomectomy should be carefully selected for UAE after counseling about all possible adverse effects on fertility. Good prospective studies focused on fertility comparing UAE with no treatment or with myomectomy are needed but would be ethically questionable. This review summarizes the current knowledge regarding the benefits and potential risks of UAE from the point of view of the gynecologist, who should be responsible for proper indication of this treatment.
机译:子宫动脉栓塞术(UAE)是一种微创手术,具有巨大的潜在症状,可用于治疗子宫平滑肌瘤的女性。由于该方法的特殊性和可能的​​并发症,适当的适应症至关重要。患者的症状,年龄,怀孕计划以及外科和生殖史在有关阿联酋合适受试者的决策中起着重要作用。妇科医生和介入放射科医生之间需要密切合作。通常提供阿联酋作为手术治疗的替代方法。对于没有生育计划的患者,与腹部子宫切除术相比,它是一种侵入性较小的选择,对与肌瘤相关的症状和生活质量具有可比的效果。与子宫切除术后相比,阿联酋患者(5年内高达35%)对再干预的需求明显增加。有较大症状的肌瘤的女性希望保留子宫并且不适合微创(腹腔镜或阴道)子宫切除术,是阿联酋的理想人选。但是,缺乏将阿联酋与微创子宫切除术进行比较的研究。在希望怀孕的年轻女性中使用阿联酋更具争议性,这主要是因为流产的风险很高(在某些研究中高达64%),以及其他妊娠并发症(如早产,胎盘异常,和产后出血。阿联酋发生不孕或亚生育的风险未知。在咨询了所有可能对生育的不利影响后,即使是较弱的子宫肌瘤切除术候选人也应谨慎选择阿联酋。需要对生育力进行良好的前瞻性研究,以比较未经治疗或经子宫肌瘤切除术的阿联酋,但在伦理上存在疑问。这篇综述从妇科医师的角度总结了有关阿联酋的益处和潜在风险的当前知识,妇科医师应负责这种治疗的正确适应症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号