首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Scholarly Research Notices >Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal
【2h】

Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal

机译:报告医学研究的指南:关键评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As a response to a low quality of reporting of medical research, guidelines for several different types of study design have been developed to secure accurate reporting and transparency for reviewers and readers from the scientific community. Herein, we review and discuss the six most widely accepted and used guidelines: PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE, MOOSE, STARD, and SPIRIT. It is concluded that the implementation of these guidelines has led to only a moderate improvement in the quality of the reporting of medical research. There is still much work to be done to achieve accurate and transparent reporting of medical research findings.
机译:作为对医学研究报告质量低下的一种回应,已经开发了几种不同类型研究设计的指南,以确保科学界的审阅者和读者获得准确的报告和透明性。在这里,我们回顾并讨论了六个最广泛接受和使用的准则:PRISMA,CONSORT,STROBE,MOOSE,STARD和SPIRIT。结论是,这些准则的实施仅导致医学研究报告质量的适度改善。要实现准确而透明的医学研究发现报告,还有许多工作要做。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号