首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Integrated Blood Pressure Control >A review of the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation and its effectiveness in the delivery of antihypertensive drug treatment (focus on nifedipine GITS)
【2h】

A review of the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation and its effectiveness in the delivery of antihypertensive drug treatment (focus on nifedipine GITS)

机译:胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)配方及其在降压药物治疗中的有效性综述(关注硝苯地平GITS)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Hypertension treatment guidelines do not discriminate within drug classes and, furthermore, do not consider whether or not all of the formulations of any given drug licensed for once-daily administration can be considered to be therapeutically interchangeable. This article focuses on this issue with respect to nifedipine and the development of the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation. Nifedipine GITS is regarded as the gold standard once-daily formulation of nifedipine and, as such, it is anticipated that alternative formulations will be therapeutically equivalent to nifedipine GITS. In general, this depends on demonstrating pharmacokinetic bioequivalence. This article is intended to focus attention on generic substitution and, in particular, on aspects of the scientific basis for the substitution of generic products in place of branded products. Such substitution is required for cost-saving or cost-containment reasons and is justified on the basis that the generic (substitute) drug is “therapeutically” equivalent to the branded drug. Unfortunately, there are serious shortcomings in the current methods of assessment insofar as they are typically based on statistical comparisons of average pharmacokinetic parameter values, using arbitrary comparative criteria. This article illustrates the shortcomings of the current approaches to generic substitution and concludes that, in regulatory terms, either more rigorous pharmacokinetic criteria are required or pharmacodynamic indices should be added to reinforce the regulatory criteria. Generic substitution is a balancing act but, at the moment, the cost issue is dominant. To restore the balance, equivalent efficacy must be confirmed. At present, therefore, in the absence of such regulatory rigor, the obvious course is to prefer the branded product, the therapeutic efficacy of which (including outcome benefits) has been established.
机译:高血压治疗指南在药物类别中没有区别,而且,没有考虑是否许可将每天给药一次的任何给定药物的所有制剂视为在治疗上可互换。本文主要针对硝苯地平和胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)制剂的开发问题。硝苯地平GITS被视为硝苯地平每日一次的黄金标准制剂,因此,预计替代制剂在治疗上将等同于硝苯地平GITS。通常,这取决于证明药代动力学生物等效性。本文旨在将注意力集中在通用替代品上,尤其是替代品牌产品替代通用产品的科学基础方面。出于节省成本或控制成本的原因,需要进行这种替代,并基于仿制药(治疗)等同于品牌药物的理由进行辩解。不幸的是,目前的评估方法存在严重的缺陷,因为它们通常是基于平均药代动力学参数值的统计比较,使用任意比较标准。本文说明了通用替代品当前方法的不足之处,并得出结论,就监管而言,需要更严格的药代动力学标准或应添加药效学指标以加强监管标准。通用替代是一种平衡行为,但目前,成本问题占主导地位。为了恢复平衡,必须确认等效功效。因此,目前,在缺乏这种严格的监管的情况下,显而易见的做法是选择品牌产品,该产品的治疗功效(包括疗效)已经确立。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号