首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Interface Focus >On the possibility (or lack thereof) of agreement between experiment and computation of flows over wings at moderate Reynolds number
【2h】

On the possibility (or lack thereof) of agreement between experiment and computation of flows over wings at moderate Reynolds number

机译:关于中雷诺数机翼上的实验与计算之间达成协议的可能性(或缺乏协议)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The flight of many birds and bats, and their robotic counterparts, occurs over a range of chord-based Reynolds numbers from 1 × 104 to 1.5 × 105. It is precisely over this range where the aerodynamics of simple, rigid, fixed wings becomes extraordinarily sensitive to small changes in geometry and the environment, with two sets of consequences. The first is that practical lifting devices at this scale will likely not be simple, rigid, fixed wings. The second is that it becomes non-trivial to make baseline comparisons for experiment and computation, when either one can be wrong. Here we examine one ostensibly simple case of the NACA 0012 aerofoil and make careful comparison between the technical literature, and new experiments and computations. The agreement (or lack thereof) will establish one or more baseline results and some sensitivities around them. The idea is that the diagnostic procedures will help to guide comparisons and predictions in subsequent more complex cases.
机译:许多鸟类和蝙蝠及其机器人的飞行,发生在基于和弦的雷诺数范围内,从1×10 4 到1.5×10 5 。正是在此范围内,简单,刚性,固定翼的空气动力学特性对几何形状和环境的微小变化变得格外敏感,产生了两种后果。首先是这种规模的实用起重设备可能不会是简单,坚固,固定的机翼。第二个是,当其中一个可能是错误的时,进行基准比较以进行实验和计算变得很简单。在这里,我们研究了一个表面上看似简单的NACA 0012机翼,并仔细比较了技术文献,新的实验和计算方法。协议(或没有协议)将确定一个或多个基线结果,并对它们周围产生一些敏感性。想法是,诊断程序将有助于在后续更复杂的情况下指导比较和预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号