首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>ISRN Gastroenterology >Prescreening with FOBT Improves Yield and Is Cost-Effective in Colorectal Screening in the Elderly
【2h】

Prescreening with FOBT Improves Yield and Is Cost-Effective in Colorectal Screening in the Elderly

机译:FOBT的预筛查可提高产率并在老年人结肠直肠筛查中具有成本效益。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background. Utilization of colonoscopy for routine colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the elderly (patients over 75) is controversial. This study was designed to evaluate if using fecal occult blood test (FOBT) to select patients for colonoscopy can improve yield and be a cost- effective approach for the elderly. Methods. Records of 10,908 subjects who had colonoscopy during the study period were reviewed. 1496 (13.7%) were ≥75 years. In 118 of these subjects, a colonoscopy was performed to evaluate a positive FOBT. Outcomes were compared between +FOBT group (F-Group) and the asymptomatic screening group (AS-Group). The cost-effectiveness was also calculated using a median estimated standardized worldwide colonoscopy and FOBT cost (rounded to closest whole numbers) of 1000 US $ and 10 US $, respectively. Results. 118/1496 (7.9%) colonoscopies were performed for evaluation of +FOBT. 464/1496 (31%) colonoscopies were performed in AS-Group. In F-Group, high risk adenoma detection rate (HR-ADR) was 15.2%, and 11.9% had 1-2 tubular adenomas. In comparison, the control AS-Group had HR-ADR of 19.2% and 17.7% had 1-2 tubular adenomas. In the FOBT+ group, CRC was detected in 5.1% which was significantly higher than the AS-Group in which CRC was detected in 1.7% (P = 0.03). On cost-effectiveness analysis, cost per CRC detected was significantly lower, that is, 19,666 US $ in F-Group in comparison to AS-Group 58,000 US $ (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in other parameters among groups. Conclusion. Prescreening with FOBT to select elderly for colonoscopy seems to improve the yield and can be a cost-effective CRC screening approach in this subset. The benefit in the risk benefit analysis of screening the elderly appears improved by prescreening with an inexpensive tool.
机译:背景。结肠镜检查在老年人(75岁以上患者)中常规筛查大肠癌(CRC)方面存在争议。本研究旨在评估使用粪便潜血测试(FOBT)选择结肠镜检查患者是否可以提高收率并成为老年人的一种经济有效的方法。方法。回顾了研究期间10,908名接受结肠镜检查的受试者的记录。 ≥75岁为1496(13.7%)岁。在118名这些受试者中,进行了结肠镜检查以评估阳性FOBT。比较+ FOBT组(F组)和无症状筛查组(AS组)的结果。还使用标准化的全球结肠镜检查的中位数估算值和FOBT成本(四舍五入为最接近的整数)分别计算了1000美元和10美元。结果。进行了118/1496(7.9%)结肠镜检查以评估+ FOBT。在AS组中进行了464/1496(31%)结肠镜检查。在F组中,高危腺瘤检出率(HR-ADR)为15.2%,其中11.9%有1-2个肾小管腺瘤。相比之下,对照组AS组的HR-ADR为19.2%,而17.7%的则为1-2个肾小管腺瘤。在FOBT +组中,检出CRC的比例为5.1%,大大高于在AS组中检出CRC的比例为1.7%(P = 0.03)。在成本效益分析中,检测到的每个CRC的成本均显着降低,即F-Group为19,666美元,而AS-Group为58,000美元(P <0.05)。各组之间其他参数无显着差异。结论。用FOBT进行预筛查以选择老年人进行结肠镜检查似乎可以提高产量,并且在该亚组中可以是一种具有成本效益的CRC筛查方法。通过廉价的工具进行预筛查,似乎可以改善筛查老年人的风险收益分析中的收益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号