首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>ISRN Pharmacology >Efficacy and Clinical Determinants of Antipsychotic Polypharmacy in Psychotic Patients Experiencing an Acute Relapse and Admitted to Hospital Stay: Results from a Cross-Sectional and a Subsequent Longitudinal Pilot Study
【2h】

Efficacy and Clinical Determinants of Antipsychotic Polypharmacy in Psychotic Patients Experiencing an Acute Relapse and Admitted to Hospital Stay: Results from a Cross-Sectional and a Subsequent Longitudinal Pilot Study

机译:抗精神病药多药治疗精神病患者急性复发并准许住院的疗效和临床决定因素:一项跨部门和后续纵向试验研究的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background. Antipsychotic polypharmacy is used in several psychiatric disorders, despite poor evidence existing to support this practice. Aim. We evaluated whether psychotic patients in acute relapse exposed to antipsychotic polypharmacy (AP + AP) showed different demographic, clinical, or psychopathological features compared to those exposed to one antipsychotic (AP) and whether AP + AP patients showed significantly higher improvement compared to AP patients after a 4-week treatment. Methods. Inpatients were subdivided into AP + AP and AP ones. In the cross-sectional step, patients were compared according to demographics, clinical variables, and scores on rating scales. In the longitudinal step, patients remained for 4 weeks under admission medications and were compared for clinical improvement. Results. AP + AP patients were more frequently diagnosed with schizophrenia and mental retardation as a comorbid illness. AP + AP patients were more frequently under first-generation antipsychotics and had worse clinical presentation. After 4 weeks of treatment, both AP + AP and AP patients improved compared to the baseline. However, AP patients scored significantly less than AP + AP patients at the Clinical Global Impression Scale at the 4-week time point but not at the baseline, indicating a treatment-specific improvement. Conclusions. Antipsychotic polypharmacy may be offered to specific types of psychotic patients. However, efficacy of this strategy is limited at best.
机译:背景。尽管存在证据不足以支持这种精神病治疗方法,但抗精神病药物多药治疗仍可用于多种精神疾病。目标。我们评估了暴露于抗精神病药房(AP + AP)的急性复发性精神病患者与暴露于一种抗精神病药(AP)的患者相比是否表现出不同的人口统计学,临床或精神病理学特征,并且与AP患者相比,AP + AP患者是否表现出明显更高的改善经过4周的治疗。方法。将住院患者分为AP + AP和AP患者。在横断面步骤中,根据人口统计学,临床变量和评分量表评分对患者进行比较。在纵向步骤中,患者接受入院药物治疗4周,并进行临床改善比较。结果。 AP + AP患者更常被诊断为精神分裂症和智力低下为合并症。 AP + AP患者使用第一代抗精神病药物的频率更高,临床表现也较差。治疗4周后,AP + AP和AP患者均较基线水平有所改善。但是,在4周的时间点上,AP患者在《临床总体印象量表》上的得分显着低于AP + AP患者,但在基线时未得分,表明治疗特异性改善。结论。抗精神病药房可能会提供给特定类型的精神病患者。但是,这种策略的功效充其量是有限的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号