首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon >Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery: A pilot study during the introductory period at a local municipal hospital
【2h】

Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery: A pilot study during the introductory period at a local municipal hospital

机译:机器人辅助腹腔镜直肠手术的短期结果:在介绍期间在当地市立医院进行的一项初步研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives: The aim of this pilot study was to confirm the safety and feasibility of the induction of robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery (RRS) at a local municipal hospital. A municipal hospital does not indicate a small hospital. The most significant difference between a municipal hospital and a center or university hospital is that most surgeons in a municipal hospital are general surgeons. Methods: The first 30 patients who underwent RRS at the municipal hospital were enrolled between April 2015 and June 2016. All surgeries were performed by a single trained surgeon using the da Vinci Si surgical system. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative major complications. Results: Of the study patients, 29 had adenocarcinoma and 1 had ulcerative colitis. The surgical procedures included anterior resection (n = 22), intersphincteric resection (n = 2), abdominoperineal resection (n = 4), Hartmann's procedure (n = 1), and total coloproctectomy (n = 1). There were no intraoperative complications and conversion cases. The median operative time and blood loss were 283.5 min and 9 ml, respectively. The incidence rate of postoperative major complications was 10%, which included anastomotic leakage in 2 patients and ileus in 1 patient. Postoperative urinary dysfunction did not occur in any patient. Complete resection was achieved for all patients. Conclusions: We demonstrated that the induction of RRS was safe and feasible, even at a local municipal hospital, given that the surgeons had the sufficient skills and experience in both laparoscopic and colorectal surgery. *The study protocol was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000017022).
机译:目的:这项初步研究的目的是确认在当地市政医院进行机器人辅助腹腔镜直肠手术(RRS)的安全性和可行性。市立医院并不表示小型医院。市立医院与中心医院或大学医院之间最显着的区别是,市立医院中的大多数外科医生都是普通外科医生。方法:在2015年4月至2016年6月之间,对首30名在市立医院接受RRS的患者进行了研究。所有手术均由一名训练有素的外科医生使用da Vinci Si手术系统进行。主要终点是术后主要并发症的发生率。结果:在研究的患者中,29例患有腺癌,1例患有溃疡性结肠炎。外科手术包括前切除术(n = 22),括约肌切除术(n = 2),腹腔手术切除术(n = 4),哈特曼手术(n = 1)和全结肠切除术(n = 1)。没有术中并发症和转换病例。中位手术时间和失血量分别为283.5分钟和9毫升。术后主要并发症发生率为10%,其中包括吻合口漏2例,肠梗阻1例。所有患者均未发生术后尿路功能障碍。所有患者均已完全切除。结论:我们证明,即使外科医生在腹腔镜和结直肠外科手术方面具有足够的技能和经验,即使在当地的市政医院,RRS的诱导也是安全可行的。 *研究方案已在大学医院医学信息网络(UMIN000017022)中注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号