首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics >Does Pretreatment with Progestogen or Oral Contraceptive Pills in Low Responders Followed by the GnRHa Flare Protocol Improve the Outcome of IVF-ET?
【2h】

Does Pretreatment with Progestogen or Oral Contraceptive Pills in Low Responders Followed by the GnRHa Flare Protocol Improve the Outcome of IVF-ET?

机译:在低应答者中进行孕激素或口服避孕药的预处理然后实施GnRHa眩光方案是否可以改善IVF-ET的结果?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose: Women undergoing in vitro fertilization with lowovarian reserve and poor response to controlled ovarianhyperstimulation (COH) present a management dilemma.In a retrospective observational study, we compared thepretreatment use of the gestogen medroxyprogesterone acetate(10 mg twice daily from day 15 of the cycle for aminimum of 2 weeks) with an oral contraceptive pill (onetablet daily from day 4 of the cycle for a minimum of 3 weeks).>Methods: The criteria for inclusion in the study includedone or more of the following: abandoned cycles due topoor response, fewer than four oocytes retrieved followinga standard COH protocol, age >39 years, and elevatedbasal serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH).Thirty-eight women received pretreatment with gestogen, and asimilar number of women received pretreatment with thepill. The flare protocol was used in all treatment cyclescombined with an individualized dose of human menopausalgonadotropin (hMG) (4–8 ampoules/day of 75 units FSH/ampoule) depending on previous response, age, and earlyfollicular serum FSH level. Both groups were similar inmean age, duration of infertility, early follicular FSH levels,and the distribution of various aetiologies.>Results: Twenty-nine cycles were abandoned before oocyteretrieval, 15 (39.5%) in the pill group and 14 (36.8%) inthe gestogen group, because of an inadequate ovarianresponse. The mean (±SD) number of ampoules (75 IUFSH/ampoule) of hMG used per cycle was similar in thepill and gestogen groups (59.7 ± 19.3 vs. 70.2 ± 29.4,respectively). There also was no difference seen in the numbersof oocytes retrieved (4.4 ± 2.3 vs. 4.2 ± 2.5), totalnumber of embryos (2.5 ± 2.4 vs. 2.2 ± 1.1), or the numberof embryos transferred (1.8 ± 1.2 vs. 2.1 ± 1.0) in the pilland gestogen groups, respectively. One pregnancy in eachgroup resulted following embryo transfer in 22 women inthe pill group and in 24 women in the gestogen group.>Conclusions: We conclude that pre-IVF treatment with oralcontraceptive pill or gestogen combined with the flare protocolin women at high risk of or with a history of poor ovarianresponse, as defined in this study, did not appear to resultin an improvement in outcome of IVF-embryo transfer.
机译:>目的:接受体外受精,卵巢储备低并且对卵巢过度刺激症(COH)反应较差的妇女存在管理难题。在一项回顾性观察性研究中,我们比较了孕激素甲羟孕酮(10 mg两次)的预处理使用情况。口服避孕药(从周期第15天开始,每天至少2周,每天至少2周,至少3周)。>方法:纳入药物的标准该研究包括以下一项或多项措施:由于反应欠佳而放弃了周期,按照标准的COH方案回收的卵母细胞少于四个,年龄> 39岁以及基础血清促卵泡激素(FSH)升高.38名妇女接受了孕激素预处理,以及相当多的妇女接受了该药的预处理。在所有治疗周期中均使用了光晕方案,并结合了单独剂量的人类更年期促性腺激素(hMG)(4-8安瓿/天,每天75单位FSH /安瓿),具体取决于先前的反应,年龄和早期卵泡血清FSH水平。两组的平均年龄,不育持续时间,早期卵泡FSH水平以及各种病因的分布都相似。>结果:取卵前放弃了29个周期,丸组为15个(39.5%)孕激素组中有14例(36.8%),因​​为卵巢反应不足。药丸和孕激素组每个周期使用的hMG的安瓿平均数(±SD)(75 IUFSH /安瓿)相似(分别为59.7±19.3和70.2±29.4)。取回的卵母细胞数(4.4±2.3 vs. 4.2±2.5),胚胎总数(2.5±2.4 vs. 2.2±1.1)或转移的胚胎数(1.8±1.2 vs. 2.1±1.0)也没有差异。 )分别在pilland孕激素组中。丸组中的22名妇女和孕激素组中的24名妇女在胚胎移植后每组怀孕1次。>结论:我们得出的结论是,IVF前口服避孕药或孕激素联合耀斑方案治疗的妇女如本研究所定义,处于高风险或卵巢反应不良史的人似乎并未导致IVF-胚胎移植结局的改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号