首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis >EXAMINING THE GENERALITY OF CHILDRENS PREFERENCE FOR CONTINGENT REINFORCEMENT VIA EXTENSION TO DIFFERENT RESPONSES REINFORCERS AND SCHEDULES
【2h】

EXAMINING THE GENERALITY OF CHILDRENS PREFERENCE FOR CONTINGENT REINFORCEMENT VIA EXTENSION TO DIFFERENT RESPONSES REINFORCERS AND SCHEDULES

机译:通过扩展到不同的反应补给和时间表来检查儿童偏好的一般性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Studies that have assessed whether children prefer contingent reinforcement (CR) or noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) have shown that they prefer CR. Preference for CR has, however, been evaluated only under continuous reinforcement (CRF) schedules. The prevalence of intermittent reinforcement (INT) warrants an evaluation of whether preference for CR persists as the schedule of reinforcement is thinned. In the current study, we evaluated 2 children's preference for contingent versus noncontingent delivery of highly preferred edible items for academic task completion under CRF and INT schedules. Children (a) preferred CR to NCR under the CRF schedule, (b) continued to prefer CR as the schedule of reinforcement became intermittent, and (c) exhibited a shift in preference from CR to NCR as the schedule became increasingly thin. These findings extend the generality of and provide one set of limits to the preference for CR. Applied implications, variables controlling preferences, and future research are discussed.
机译:评估儿童是喜欢临时性强化(CR)还是非临时性强化(NCR)的研究表明,他们更喜欢CR。但是,仅在连续补强(CRF)计划下评估了CR的偏好。间歇性补强(INT)的发生率需要评估,随着补强计划的减少,对CR的偏好是否仍然存在。在当前的研究中,我们评估了2个孩子对于在CRF和INT时间表下完成学业任务的偏好性还是非偶然性的首选食品的偏爱。孩子们(a)在CRF时间表下更喜欢CR,而不是NCR;(b)随着强化时间表变得断断续续,继续偏爱CR;(c)随着时间表越来越薄,儿童表现出了从CR到NCR的偏好转变。这些发现扩展了CR的通用性,并为CR的偏爱提供了一组限制。讨论了应用含义,控制偏好的变量以及未来的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号