首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis >The impact of functional analysis methodology on treatment choice for self-injurious and aggressive behavior.
【2h】

The impact of functional analysis methodology on treatment choice for self-injurious and aggressive behavior.

机译:功能分析方法学对自残和攻击行为治疗选择的影响。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Self-injurious behavior (SIB) and aggression have been the concern of researchers because of the serious impact these behaviors have on individuals' lives. Despite the plethora of research on the treatment of SIB and aggressive behavior, the reported findings have been inconsistent regarding the effectiveness of reinforcement-based versus punishment-based procedures. We conducted a literature review to determine whether a trend could be detected in researchers' selection of reinforcement-based procedures versus punishment-based procedures, particularly since the introduction of functional analysis to behavioral assessment. The data are consistent with predictions made in the past regarding the potential impact of functional analysis methodology. Specifically, the findings indicate that, once maintaining variables for problem behavior are identified, experimenters tend to choose reinforcement-based procedures rather than punishment-based procedures as treatment for both SIB and aggressive behavior. Results indicated an increased interest in studies on the treatment of SIB and aggressive behavior, particularly since 1988.
机译:自残行为(SIB)和攻击行为一直是研究人员关注的问题,因为这些行为会对个人的生活造成严重影响。尽管对SIB的治疗和攻击性行为进行了大量研究,但报告的发现在基于强化和基于惩罚的程序的有效性方面并不一致。我们进行了文献综述,以确定研究人员在选择基于强化的程序还是基于惩罚的程序时是否可以检测到趋势,特别是在将行为分析引入功能分析之后。数据与过去有关功能分析方法的潜在影响的预测一致。具体而言,研究结果表明,一旦确定了维持问题行为的变量,实验人员就倾向于选择基于强化的程序而不是基于惩罚的程序作为SIB和攻击性行为的治疗方法。结果表明,特别是自1988年以来,人们对SIB的治疗和攻击行为的研究越来越感兴趣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号