首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Netherlands Heart Journal >The FOLLOWPACE study: a prospective study on the (cost-)effectiveness of routine follow-up visits in patients with a pacemaker
【2h】

The FOLLOWPACE study: a prospective study on the (cost-)effectiveness of routine follow-up visits in patients with a pacemaker

机译:FOLLOWPACE研究:对起搏器患者进行常规随访的(成本)效果的前瞻性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In the Netherlands, following implantation of a pacemaker (PM) commonly two or three out-patient follow-up visits are scheduled in the first year to check the patient's health and the PM programme, in order to guarantee optimal patient outcome. Anually, about 200,000 follow-up visits of 20 minutes are performed, in total about 80,000 working hours. The question arises whether and to what extent these regular follow-up checks are truly necessary for the prognosis of the patient and whether they are cost-effective. Yet no information is available on how frequently and extensively a routine PM follow-up visit should be performed. This is probably because it is largely unknown which factors — either documented at PM implantation or at the follow-up visits - predict the occurrence of complications. The FOLLOWPACE study is designed to address these issues. Below we briefly discuss the rationale, objectives and expected results of FOLLOWPACE.
机译:在荷兰,植入起搏器(PM)后,通常在第一年安排两次或三次门诊随访,以检查患者的健康状况和PM计划,以确保获得最佳的患者预后。每年约进行20分钟的200,000次随访,总共约80,000个工作小时。问题是,对于患者的预后,这些定期的随访检查是否真正必要以及在何种程度上真正必要,以及它们是否具有成本效益。然而,目前尚无关于应该多长时间进行一次广泛的例行PM随访访问的信息。这可能是因为在很大程度上未知因素(无论是在PM植入时还是在随访中记录)可预测并发症的发生。 FOLLOWPACE研究旨在解决这些问题。下面我们简要讨论FOLLOWPACE的基本原理,目标和预期结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号