首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>New Microbes and New Infections >Comparison of Binax NOW urine antigen test and pneumococcal DNA assay using qPCR before and after nasopharyngeal swabbing in healthy Malawian children
【2h】

Comparison of Binax NOW urine antigen test and pneumococcal DNA assay using qPCR before and after nasopharyngeal swabbing in healthy Malawian children

机译:马拉维健康儿童鼻咽部拭子前后使用Binax NOW尿液抗原检测和qPCR检测肺炎球菌DNA的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Diagnosis of invasive pneumococcal disease is challenging. We compared Binax NOW pneumococcal urinary antigen test with blood pneumococcal PCR in healthy Malawian children with and without pneumococcal carriage, and we found a high false-positive rate with Binax NOW. Blood pneumococcal PCR positivity was 66/88 (75%) compared to 5/27 (18%) when nasopharyngeal swabbing was performed first compared to after blood sampling for pneumococcal blood PCR. We speculate that nasopharyngeal swabbing may be causing a breach of mucosal integrity, leading to invasion into the bloodstream. These findings need to be confirmed with autolysin-based PCR assays.
机译:侵袭性肺炎球菌疾病的诊断具有挑战性。我们将健康和不携带肺炎球菌的马拉维儿童中的Binax NOW肺炎球菌尿液抗原检测与血液肺炎球菌PCR进行了比较,发现Binax NOW的假阳性率很高。与首先进行鼻咽擦拭相比,对肺炎球菌血液PCR进行血液采样后,血液肺炎球菌PCR的阳性率为66/88(75%),相比之下,该数据为5/27(18%)。我们推测鼻咽拭子可能会导致粘膜完整性破坏,从而导致其侵入血液。这些发现需要通过基于自动溶素的PCR分析来证实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号