首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Biomedical Semantics >Towards valid and reusable reference alignments — ten basic quality checks for ontology alignments and their application to three different reference data sets
【2h】

Towards valid and reusable reference alignments — ten basic quality checks for ontology alignments and their application to three different reference data sets

机译:迈向有效和可重用的参考比对-本体比对及其对三个不同参考数据集的十项基本质量检查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Identifying relationships between hitherto unrelated entities in different ontologies is the key task of ontology alignment. An alignment is either manually created by domain experts or automatically by an alignment system. In recent years, several alignment systems have been made available, each using its own set of methods for relation detection. To evaluate and compare these systems, typically a manually created alignment is used, the so-called reference alignment. Based on our experience with several of these reference alignments we derived requirements and translated them into simple quality checks to ensure the alignments’ validity and also their reusability. In this article, these quality checks are applied to a standard reference alignment in the biomedical domain, the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative Anatomy track reference alignment, and two more recent data sets covering multiple domains, including but not restricted to anatomy and biology.
机译:识别迄今为止在不同本体中不相关的实体之间的关系是本体对齐的关键任务。比对可以由领域专家手动创建,也可以由比对系统自动创建。近年来,已经提供了几种对准系统,每种对准系统使用其自己的一组用于关系检测的方法。为了评估和比较这些系统,通常使用手动创建的路线,即所谓的参考路线。根据我们在其中几种参考标准中的经验,我们得出了要求并将其转换为简单的质量检查,以确保这些标准的有效性和可重复使用性。在本文中,这些质量检查将应用于生物医学领域中的标准参考比对,本体论比对评估计划解剖跟踪参考比对以及两个涵盖多个领域的最新数据集,包括但不限于解剖学和生物学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号