首页> 外文期刊>Expert Systems with Application >Optimizing ontology alignment through Memetic Algorithm based on Partial Reference Alignment
【24h】

Optimizing ontology alignment through Memetic Algorithm based on Partial Reference Alignment

机译:基于部分引用比对的Memetic算法优化本体比对

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

All the state of the art approaches based on evolutionary algorithm (EA) for addressing the meta-match-ing problem in ontology alignment require the domain expert to provide a reference alignment (RA) between two ontologies in advance. Since the RA is very expensive to obtain especially when the scale of ontology is very large, in this paper, we propose to use the Partial Reference Alignment (PRA) built by clustering-based approach to take the place of RA in the process of using evolutionary approach. Then a problem-specific Memetic Algorithm (MA) is proposed to address the meta-matching problem by optimizing the aggregation of three different basic similarity measures (Syntactic Measure, Linguistic Measure and Taxonomy based Measure) into a single similarity metric. The experimental results have shown that using PRA constructed by our approach in most cases leads to higher quality of solution than using PRA built in randomly selecting classes from ontology and the quality of solution is very close to the approach using RA where the precision value of solution is generally high. Comparing to the state of the art ontology matching systems, our approach is able to obtain more accurate results. Moreover, our approach's performance is better than GOAL approach based on Genetic Algorithm (GA) and RA with the average improvement up to 50.61%. Therefore, the proposed approach is both effective.
机译:用于解决本体对准中的元匹配问题的所有基于进化算法(EA)的现有技术方法都要求领域专家预先在两个本体之间提供参考对准(RA)。由于获取RA的成本很高,尤其是当本体的规模很大时,因此,本文建议在基于聚类的方法中使用基于聚类的方法建立的部分参考比对(PRA)来代替RA。进化方法。然后,提出了一种针对问题的Memetic算法(MA),通过将三种不同的基本相似性度量(句法度量,语言度量和基于分类法的度量)聚合为一个相似度量来解决元匹配问题。实验结果表明,与在本体中随机选择类别的PRA相比,使用我们的方法构造的PRA产生的解决方案质量更高,并且解决方案的质量与使用RA的解决方案的精度值非常接近。一般很高。与最先进的本体匹配系统相比,我们的方法能够获得更准确的结果。此外,我们的方法的性能优于基于遗传算法(GA)和RA的GOAL方法,平均改进率高达50.61%。因此,所提出的方法都是有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号