首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Cancer >Overall survival and post-progression survival are potent endpoint in phase III trials of second/third-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer
【2h】

Overall survival and post-progression survival are potent endpoint in phase III trials of second/third-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

机译:在晚期/复发性上皮性卵巢癌的二线/三线化疗的III期临床试验中总生存期和进展后生存期是有效的终点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose: A growing number of treatment options and active compounds in treatments have led to better outcomes for patients with advanced or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. We examined the association between progression-free survival (PFS), post-progression survival (PPS) and overall survival (OS) in phase III trials of second- and third-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. We aim to determine whether PFS or PPS is a surrogate of OS so that we can decide progress of disease is optimal endpoint for ovarian cancer.>Methods: We identified 22 trials conducted between January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2014 by literature search. We divided OS into PFS and PPS, and assessed the association between OS and PFS/PPS. We also examined whether the year of trial enrollment completion was associated with any variables.>Results: The median PPS was slightly longer in recent trials compared to older trials (10.0 vs. 8.8 months). While PPS was strongly associated with OS (r = 0.88) in all trials, PFS was moderately correlated with OS (r = 0.72). The correlation between OS and PPS in recent trials (r = 0.93) was stronger than in older trials (r = 0.84).>Conclusions: Our findings indicate that PPS is highly associated with OS in second/third-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer, while the association between PFS and OS is moderate. We recommend using OS as primary endpoint for clinical trial of ovarian cancer, however PFS is still an optional endpoint.
机译:>目的:治疗中越来越多的选择和活性化合物为晚期或复发性上皮性卵巢癌患者带来了更好的结果。在晚期或复发性上皮性卵巢癌的二线和三线化疗的III期试验中,我们检查了无进展生存期(PFS),进展后生存期(PPS)和总体生存期(OS)之间的关联。我们旨在确定PFS或PPS是否是OS的替代品,以便我们可以确定疾病进展是卵巢癌的最佳终点。>方法:我们确定了2000年1月1日至12月31日期间进行的22项试验,2014年通过文献搜索。我们将OS分为PFS和PPS,并评估了OS与PFS / PPS之间的关联。我们还检查了完成试验的年份是否与任何变量相关。>结果:与较早的试验相比,最近的试验中PPS的中位数略长(10.0 vs. 8.8个月)。在所有试验中,PPS与OS密切相关(r = 0.88),而PFS与OS中等相关(r = 0.72)。最新试验中OS与PPS之间的相关性(r = 0.93)比较早的试验(r = 0.84)中的相关性强。>结论:行晚期或复发性上皮性卵巢癌的化疗,而PFS和OS之间的相关性中等。我们建议使用OS作为卵巢癌临床试验的主要终点,但是PFS仍然是可选终点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号